EXPLANATION

When Ron Bellows a senior management risk officer for AIG was asked to assess the liabilities for their oversees defense contractors he was also made aware that what ever decision his name would go straight to the head of the most powerful military defense contractors in the world.

This heads I win, tails you lose proposition handed to Ron Bellows was the beginning of the forced entry of the United States government into the insurance industry.

In fact the insurance market has always been manipulated by Lloyds of London but the US government have always masked this manipulation of the free market by having each State within the United States regulate the various insurance companies who can operate in more than one State which gives the average American consumer the sense that there are several layers of "checks and balances" when in fact each layer is an added cost that is borne by the hard working poor who have no ability to see through it all.

Going back to the summer of 2006 I (Gary S. Gevisser) began to speak out about Lloyds of London having decided to really shove it in the face of the US Government who have allowed such a farce to continue for so long given how they opened themselves to "extortion" when having private bankers set up their own banking system; namely the US Federal Reserve with the backing of the US Government who would when needing money ask the privately owned Federal Reserve who were more than happy to oblige.

I had voiced strong objection to Lloyds which is a consortium of private banks and individuals deciding that they would not accept American citizens as "names"; i.e. investors because of the contrived losses Lloyds had been experiencing in recent years.

Lloyds is an integral part of the "monetary system" which is just a way to allocate resources away from the poor into the hands of the rich and make the poor always feel like citizen class citizens when not also feeling guilty about being poor and not able to take care of themselves.

Lloyds unashamedly accepts diamonds as collateral just so long as the diamonds have been certified in value by the mafia monopoly De Beers.

Should Ron Bellows of the world?s VISIBLY largest insurance agency have decided not insure the military defense contractors not only would he have become black listed but he very well may have been risking his life as well. As Ron explains the US government was playing with semantics by maintaining the position that the deaths were due to terrorism, not war, which would force AIG to be financially responsible instead of placing the financial responsibility on the government.

The end result left AIG insuring the military defense contractors with indefinite financial losses leading to the ultimate collapse and ?forcing? the US government to step in and falsely argue to the American people that this was needed to prevent the complete collapse of the monetary system.

Handing over control of the insurance industry to the US government, officially ended any semblance of a ?Free Market? system.

MILITARY.COM

http://forums.military.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4960045241001/m/9330081502001

EVIDENCE

From: Ron Bellows, Senior Risk Assessor for AIG
To: Gary S Gevisser 
Date: Monday, May 03, 2004 7:39 PM;
Subject: WE [megalopoly] insure... Haliburton

my point the other day - that these people have been taken and treated as war combatants when there is no war - is totally against the constitution - which apparently doesn?t exist anymore 

BUT get this .. .. 

I have now been given the project of trying to figure out our exposure for our overseas defense contractors we insure - 

thing is - the policy excludes 'acts of war' ( as most do ) - BUT - includes Terrorism ?? 

so.. .If a contractor dies from an act of war - we pay the widow and the gov't is supposed to reimburse us from their war chest 

so now - the feds are saying - "there is no war" - and we don?t get reimbursed - for all the dead, captured and "lost" contractors ( and our loss numbers are showing lots more than the news is reporting ) 

so all the actuaries and underwriters are freakin out - watching their policy breach limits and bleed cash 

so I got the order Sunday - go and figure out what KBR, Centcom and Haliberton employee exposure are and what they are doing to control their contract employees exposure ?? 

AND - this is a no win - If I pull the plug ( write a report that says its a poor risk ) my name goes to the head of KBR etc - If I say its all good - we loose money and megalopoly stomps on my tushy 

aaagghhh 

later boys 

I need a drink . . . .

PROPUBLICA.ORG COMMUNICATIONS

Sharona Coutts
Date: November 18, 2009 4:15:01 PM PST
Subject: Positive - Re: "Leverage this know-where with a mix of know-how"