Sherba to the G20 – Re: Hot women and mysticism – and Re: Morals void society – Re: The two greatest gifts – Re: For a man possessing your boundless intellect.

On Mar 23, 2017, at 1:52 PM, <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org> <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org> wrote:

I never wrote that you are a twit!

The twit was a character in the Monty Python! Reread what I wrote! I claimed that I wasn’t one. 

Sent from my iPhone h

On 23 Mar 2017, at 14:40, gg <gary@2facetruth.com> wrote:

We must revisit the Nuclear Energy Agency’s assessment of you being “unmanageable”? 

You wouldn’t be at the OECD if you were “unmanageable”.

It is just a distraction to avoid facing your short-comings and contradictions.

You are not a rebel.

You gave that up when you and your current wife stopped protesting nuclear 4 decades ago.

Unlike Genevieve who threw in the towel when one of her best friends was murdered by people she believed were closely associated with the pro nuclear movement, you decided shortly before contacting me on June 25, 2013, to join the nuclear enemy.

So you go back to your tangent of Mr. Zuckerberg, but this time you ask a question knowing perfectly well that I wouldn’t retract any of my conversations.

You obviously feel that you would if you could; and you don’t disable your FB because it gives you something to talk about other than your short comings.

I expose the good and bad of my bloodline, which is the right thing to do because we should know everything there is to know about each other otherwise we are abetting those who have done wrong.

It is only a privacy issue to those who are hiding, otherwise it is human nature to be curious about the next person unless they are totally unattractive.

If we all decide to become potted plants then it is no longer fun and we risk ending up as stupid as you.

To call me a “twit” is also not accurate.

I have fully challenged my 3 siblings, but first I started with the worst, my father’s first cousin, David Gevisser, the “male heir” of American-German monopolist-South African Invader Charles W. Engelhard Jr. who provided protection to his German-South African Oppenheimer partners who should have been the first prosecuted for their war crimes at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals [1946-47]. Moreover, I will not let up in exposing all my other blood relatives who have been corrupted which again you know perfectly well, but your goal is only to distract.

The nuclear issue has remained off the peoples’ radar screen only because of people such as yourself doing exactly what you are paid to do.

How foolish to write that they think you are productive but unmanageable.

Wouldn’t they say the same thing when you joined academia for 27 years as the senior lecturer in economics at Stanford University and without you knowing you were teaching obsolete economics?

You also keep coming back to interest rates and then throwing hifalutin words to have the masses think you know what you are talking about, but you forget that if you were that bright you would have been plucked right out of university to join the world’s most interesting and powerful banking institution who fooled you because De Beers don’t place the word “Bank” on their retail outlets who literature also does not say, “We support only the most non-competitive”.

So on your next travels to London, Bond Street, why not visit De Beers’ flagship operation and ask if you could be put in touch with their weapons procurement officer, but I wouldn’t wear a mask when entering.

You are so conflicted that you forget who you are writing to or hoping that I will be distracted not to recall teaching you that a monopolist like De Beers-Barclays who control the mineral resources including enriched uranium which you thought yourself the expert on its pricing, have no cost of capital because they create their own capital; namely diamond currency out of thin air, and nor do they have to worry about government regulators coming around and asking questions such as why they violate the money laundering laws because they have you all fully stitched up.

BTW, please let me know whether you enjoyed the letter I sent earlier to my English friend John who we had afternoon tea with the other day before a wonderful dinner together at an Italian restaurant where the subject matter stretched from politics-economics at the one end of the table where John was seated to my side where the discussion was only hot women and mysticism.

Next I will be delving into the inner sanctums of the nuclear business that I strongly suspect will have you mostly muttering to yourself; and what fun is that when you are getting old, increasingly ugly, and no one to trust.

 

[Word count 737]

On Mar 22, 2017, at 11:10 PM, <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org> <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org> wrote:

You want to talk blood money? Let’s talk about your blood and your money. You like to discuss your blood line every chance you get. And you like to discuss the source of your money whenever you can. I’m not an upper class twit!

 You should have been a part of the Monty Python crew!

I doubt if I am being watched or someone might know where I am going on Saturday. I guess not you!

And let’s be clear I only use FB every once and a while. I assume you know that Zuckerberg owns your conversations and can sell them to the highest bidder. What would you bid to retract your conversations?

Sent from my iPhone h

On 22 Mar 2017, at 23:54, gg <gary@2facetruth.com> wrote:

Suddenly you have concern for grandkids over your blood money paycheck.

I see no difference between your OECD and Marc Rich in furthering terrorism.

https://www.2facetruth.com/heads-up-you-lose-tails-we-all-lose-published-212001/

Let us discuss the discount rate-cost of money in a debate on REASON FOR BEING HERE since we disagree on logic and morals.

Save me the trouble of cutting and pasting our dialogue on to my group chat where you see a much more interesting audience than what you observe out of your glass cage.

When did you figure out that you were being watched like a hawk?

How would you describe the start of your interviewing process?

Did the interviewers inform you that they knew you and your current wife were anti nuclear protestors in the 1970s, or were you thinking smartly and immediately forthcoming?

Why didn’t you approach Snowden or Wikileaks with your “undercover work”?

BTW, how can your bosses consider you productive when you have failed to shut me up? No one right in their mind would consider you “unmanageable”. You are quite the dutiful distracting soldier.

Try seeking quicker guidance from those above you so we keep this ball alive.

How quickly you forget how successful you have been in shutting down all the opposition to nuclear, other than me.

You are very consistent in your inconsistency.

Shameless, “… keep up the fight against the sanctity of GDP”.

It is not what you say, but what you fail to say that counts most.

Nuclear radiation poisoning is alarmingly missing in your distracting speech.

You would expect that the Higher Power that forces each of us to follow logic even in a morals void society that cannot stop talking about doing the right thing, would direct the poison to the sinners only.

Mango just this moment expressed his displeasure towards you; his ears continue to twitch. He is now nodding his head in approval.

 

[Word count 324]

<thumb_20150424_105632_resized_1024_1024.jpg>

 

 

 

On Mar 22, 2017, at 3:05 PM, <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org> <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org> wrote:

Gg,

I had a dislocating shoulder operation at the end of November, so was in Antibes most of December, then somethings happened, travel I think, and now I am sitting on a fast train to Brussels.

I try to get away from the nucleocrats every chance I get: London a couple of times, a few times to Antibes, to the US, etc. At one time that had records that claimed I’d used up half my vacation time for the year by the end of February! That’s been straightened out, but still I am confused about what day it is (if necessary, I work on the weekends, go in when I want, work as long as I want; they consider me productive, but unmanageable).

I am in a glass walled office and mark the days since 1/1/17. My contract ends 7/31/2018!

I’ve already started my balls in motion to focus on the economics of nuclear waste and non-proliferation after the middle of 2018.

My presentations are now focused on defining the proper discount rate for sustainability, making a difference between the time horizon of capital markets (short!) and the time horizon for sustainability (long!). If policy makers aren’t using discount rates between 0 and 3%, they don’t give a fuck about the grandkids!

Anyway, keep up the fight against the sanctity of GDP/GNP!

Gr

Sent from my iPhone h

On 22 Mar 2017, at 15:29, gg <gary@2facetruth.com> wrote:

Geoff,

 

When are you retiring?

 

Don’t you agree, that Jean “Extraordinaire” Figadera chimed in at the perfect time on the FB group chat, REASON FOR BEING HERE?

 

Gg

 

PS – BTW, did you notice that Kelly Lawton, a law school student in the United States who I coached, along with her younger brother David also now a law student, more than a decade about The Diamond Invention game book, left REASON FOR BEING HERE exactly 11 hours ago?

 

The D I book, as you know, shows what a farce are all law and economic text books. Why not debate it, if in disagreement, on REASON FOR BEING HERE?

 

Interesting that David as well as their mother Teri Lawton, a reading therapist remain on RFBH; the same with Bolognian Giulio Arcani who must still be very curious about how it is all going to end.

 

Point being, it is hard for people in denial to coordinate their “game playing” and that does not mean they can trust each other more with the passage of time, because in fact as the information gets out on who knew what and when, there is less trust amongst liars.

 

My 3 elder siblings demonstrate perfectly that even the most close-knit family in the world don’t give a shit about anything other than grabbing the money.

 

So there you are at the OECD promoting nuclear radiation poisoning along with the heinous, most illogical Gross Domestic Product index that breeds overpopulation of human idiots, not quite sure what I am asking?

 

Geoffrey, are you too focused on counting down the days to your retirement to reason better?

 

It must be taking a toll on your thinking that when you were young and full of spirit and tons of enzymes you were protesting on the streets these insanely evil humans and you not only join them, but you have failed to follow through on your commitment to me that you would be working vigorously from the inside to expose the belly of the beast?

 

You lack of follow through has helped create a species who believe they should all be on vacation and to leave it up to the military-industrial-complex; i.e. De Beers-Barclays to wage the bloody wars which improve the GDP numbers for the winning side and penalize the losers.

 

You understand perfectly ever since you couldn’t answer the question we put to you to show us “humanity” after you proudly exclaimed the greatness of the human in bringing “civilization and humanity” to our world, that the human only cares about their own survival; and why it is that they are only polite if they feel they can get something out of the next person, and their focus is the money, thanks again to the great brainwashing success of the NEA-OECD and your master puppeteers, De Beers-Barclays.

 

Moreover, I am most comfortable leaving it all in the hands of God which is very comforting. 

 

You can see that I had a happy childhood because I had a nice mother, which is why we have the deafening silence from all those who have viewed The Lady’s Speech on Youtube and the terrific accompanying videos, as the sick human enjoys every moment that my mother is held captive in Israel.

 

BTW, what have you been doing with your time since you last wrote me back on January 29, and please only tell me if you health has dramatically improved.

 

Sun is out. Heading now on a new hike with the two greatest gifts.

 

[Word count 589]

 

On Mar 22, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Geoffrey.ROTHWELL@oecd.org wrote:

Gary,

I am not quite sure what you are asking me ?

Geoff

 

From: garystevengevisser [mailto:garystevengevisser@gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 March 2017 01:08
To: ROTHWELL Geoffrey, NEA/DEV
Cc: dlurie@yebo.co.za; ray.oshry@haroldbenjamin.com; Diane. Bell – Union Tribune; Uri Rosenberg; Office for the Israeli Department of Defense Attache Israeli Embassy Washington DC; bobbyj@gmail.com; Gary Barber – Co-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MGM; Rod Margo; matthewmargo@aol.com; Tom Shadyac – Director-Writer I AM – c/o Janet Matthews
Subject: For a man possessing your boundless intellect.

I just shut down my laptop in preparation for a great night’s sleep while watching a fatso on TV talking about his fatso TV celebrity father who died of a heart attack, and of course they all feel that their cerebral is separate from their bodies.

Don’t you think these people who mostly talk about their kindness but they are unkind to their attached bodies are funny to the point that they are entertaining to our Creator?

Do you ever think about this important subject and then go on to question what God has in mind for you?

Given how my laptop is off, could you back up the last comments between my fb friend Howard somebody and myself.

HOWARD

That sounds like the spewings of a man that’s wrapped up in himself if I’m honest. 
I understand the basics of fraction reserve banking, though I fear that this level of knowledge would not be enough for a man possessing your boundless intellect. 
I haven’t read what you’ve got to say and can safely say now that I will not be doing so in the future due to the way that you yourself come across…  Self absorbed.
Anyhow, I’m off to bed now because I, as a lowly Electrician have to up very early to go and wire apartments at break neck speed. 
Delete me from your friends list. Save me the drama. Tada..

GARY

I see that you had the mindfulness to edit what you first wrote me and that means you take what you had to say seriously. that is good.

I never asked you whether you understand, “the basics of fraction reserve banking” simply whether you understand more about how the money is valued after I gave you a good explanation?

Imagine yourself 15 years from now and probably not as healthy as you are today and someone shows you our writings before asking you, “Why wouldn’t you have taken Gary Gevisser’s good suggestion to simply read how one mining house was able to control human population to the point that the people wouldn’t question anything including the deadly radiation of nuclear energy?”

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Alpha™, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

<thumb_20150424_105632_resized_1024_1024.jpg>