Can you get me a job?
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Can you get me a job? -Re: Nicholas Oppenheimer -Re: Judgment calls - Re: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 3, 2019 at 3:08:57 PM PST
To: David.enrich@nytimes.com
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Can you get me a job? -Re: Nicholas Oppenheimer -Re: Judgment calls - Re: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 3, 2019 at 2:01:17 PM PST
To: "Silver-Greenberg, Jessica" <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com>
Cc: rest; David. Enrich" <david.enrich@dowjones.com>, "Geoffrey Rothwell - former principal economist for Nuclear Energy Agency housed within the OECD." <geoffreyrothwell@yahoo.com>, "Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. - Senior General Partner of Rosemont Realty, a subsidiary of Rosemont Capital." <jrk@classactionlaw.com>, "Deborah Sturman Esq. - replaced Kathy Gevisser Danziger as executor of Alan Zulman's estate on Zulman's death bed." <sturman@sturman.ch>, Ernest Rady <erady@americanassets.com>, "Joseph Steinberg - Chief Executive Officer of Luecadia National Corporation." <jsteinberg@sprintmail.com>, Jos Verhorst - Chairman De Amstel Club <josverhorst@amstelclub.nl>, Tim Page - British photo-journalist severely injured in Vietnam <timpagephoto@bigpond.com>, "Jeffrey Gilbert - Senior international slot machine executive; worked directly with Donald Trump and South African Gambling Czar Sol Kerzner and his deceased son, Butch." <jg@jesangil.com>, geoffrey.rothwell@turner-harris.com, George Soros <gsoros@sorosny.org>, "Matthew Margo - Senior attorney CBS - 60 Minutes. Matthew and I have known each other intimately since I headed up the restructuring team of Epilady USA Inc. starting back in late 1989." <matthewmargo@aol.com>, 60 Minutes <60m@cbsnews.com>, Vegetarian Tzipora Malka Tzipi Livni <zlivni@knesset.gov.il>, "Dr. Rod Smith Phd - formerly of RAND Think Tank - Principal Waterstrategist - Facebook friend of GG and also present at the Wetherly Capital Group board meeting on Feb. 8, 2002 held in the corporate headquarters of Arden Realty, the largest REIT trading on the New York Stock Exchange before being bought out by General Electric." <rsmith@stratwater.com>, Geoffrey van Leeuwen - Unchallenged Dutch Ambassador to Afghanistan <gvanleeuwen@yahoo.com>, "Peter van Leeuwen - Legal scholar and private university tutor." <repetitor@ziggo.nl>, "Israel Air Force Lt. Colonel Tomer Tene - Also Israel's largest organic produce farmer. ותומר טנא" <tene@arava.co.il>, "Stephen C. Meyer - Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge." <smeyer@discovery.org>, David Hillel Gelernter - Professor of computer science Yale University <david.gelernter@yale.edu>, David Berlinski - very smart mathematician-philosopher <jdixon@discovery.org>, "MaryJane Schmidt - TESLA Customer Insights Analyst, Ownership Advocacy" <mschmidt@tesla.com>, Elon Musk <NAsales@tesla.com>
Jessica, it has been going [on] 4 hours since I let you into the darkest of dark secrets.
People do not care.
If one could find one honest politician or media person or religious figure of note who got up in front of the world’s cameras and told it the way it is, by simply holding up the photo of President Putin and Nick Oppenheimer, they would be killed, right?
At least that is probably the majority consensus.
More importantly, the thinking does not go beyond where a group of people caring about their children if no one else don’t make it their life’s work to expose these important truths which no one wants to hear because they feel so utterly stupid.
Realizing that they are not Elon Musk and haven’t done much with their lives to be proud [of] and most certainly not so fortunate to have a mother like mine who applauds me so and which the people all ignore because it does not suit them that my mother Zena is so demonstratively articulate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL4qdY7ESzE
preferring instead to see my mother Zena as “invisible”, and what better evidence of the vulgarity of the human than their silent comments on The Lady’s Speech.
Deafening silences speak volumes.
It is much more than the human has no shame.
What social media provides and which the DAAC architects of the Diamond Invention Game [DIG] never envisioned when putting the pieces in place to allow Germany to arise from the ashes of World War I, was that even the most poorly educated can be stopped dead in their tracks and revisit their brainwashing.
Let me give you one example.
At 9:10 AM Calif. I began a facebook messaging conversation with one of my 1324 facebook friends:
Gary:
What do you do?
I write on the economy.
Facebook friend:
Where are you from
Gary:
Born and raised in South Africa; so what do you do?
Fb friend:
I run Equipment and drive heavy haul trucks . Here in Northern Alberta Canada
Gary:
Do you work for a mining company?
I used to work for De Beers-Anglo American Corporation [DAAC]. Have you heard of them?
Fb friend:
No right now I am driving for a fuel Company hauling fuel . De- Beers Diamond mines ??
Gary:
Yes De Beers diamond mining ++++
How well do you know our mutual facebook friend X X?
Fb fried:
Excellent can you get me a job ?
Gary:
Most unlikely. I am quite the thorn in their side.
Fb friend:
Lol
Alberta is going down the tubes economically . Thanks to our Communist Prime minister Justin Trudeau
Gary:
You probably never thought that Trudeau was bought by the most capitalist enterprise on the planet.
Do you associate monopolies with communism or capitalism or socialism?
How much formal schooling do you have?
Remember my question about X?
Fb friend:
Trade school and 9 years army out of school .
10:19 AM Calif. time
Gary:
What branch of the services, and what rank did you achieve?
Jessica, notice that he was stumped by my question, "Do you associate monopolies with communism or capitalism or socialism?”, and could you fault my lead in?
You are also capable of imagining how his future writings expressed the enormity of the calamity when instantly realizing that he got suckered into thinking that there is any difference amongst the politicians, the political parties, and most of all the different economic systems.
Imagine which people would profit from floating the idea that we should be aware of a New World Order run by global corporations?
Imagine all the world’s professors and teachers not digging further even though they all know that it takes raw materials such as water, uranium, copper, iron, coal etc to produce other materials and eventually finished goods.
Imagine all the world’s intellectuals never figuring out the logical insanity and moral depravity of the Gross Domestic Product index and there have never been so many humans on this planet who can’t blame their handheld computing devices for such mass stupidity.
It is no less difficult to imagine how if this fuel truck driver and my dialogue coupled with your and my dialogue were to be displayed on a large screen before first year psychology, economics, business, finance, journalism and law students attending their first lecture at university there would be no need for the lecturer to bother showing their face.
How quickly do you think word would spread throughout the university campus?
Your guess is as good as mine.
Now you can see that I'm introducing you to economist Dr. Geoffrey Rothwell Phd, the former principal economist for the Nuclear Energy Agency-OECD who once he became acquainted with the photo of Putin and Oppenheimer made it his business to join the beast and that took a few years.
Much more importantly 6 months after getting the most important job of his career, moving to Paris and becoming instantly the most important American on the European continent, Rothwell contacted me - see ABOUT section of 2facetruth.com - to let me know in no uncertain terms that his NEA-OECD had effectively wiped out all opposition to nuclear weapons development.
Despite directing me to nuclear opposition website that went nowhere, I didn’t simply leave it [at] that because I am a conscious being.
When we met for dinner in Paris, along with our respective wives some 2 months and 22 days later [September 16, 2013], I wasted no time in asking Rothwell the military component in his mathematical equations which had him projecting the cost of enriched uranium which impressed his future bosses at the NEA-OECD.
Let’s just say the rest of the dinner conversation was interesting.
You are not lost as you have previously said, "I don't know what you are talking about” because at the very start of my response to your email that I should call you this morning I wrote something that sparked your mind, "to know banking you have to be totally expert in the mining game” which I know was not covered in your university education or at any time before or since.
Yet it is common sense.
Everyone thinks they have common sense and furthermore that it is others who are ignorant, not them.
When they find out that they are totally ignorant about all the things they sprout forth from their mouths they write the same old trash:
We are all slaves our societies have been destroyed starting with the basic building blocks of the family unit . Most people are slaves to debt which I'd better because traditional slaves are kept by the slave owners . We have to feed and clothe ourselves
BTW, David Enrich showed no interest in me introducing him to Dr. Geoffrey Rothwell Phd.
Let me emphasize. The people do not care.
The people do not care that nuclear radiation kills because they have other things more important on their minds such as covering up their wrongdoing and paying for things like rent, mortgages, food, clothing, beer, bullets for the guns to shoot game and so on and so forth.
As a curious human being wouldn’t you be interested to see how the rest of the conversation with this fuel truck driver continues or have I painted a sufficiently good picture?
Notice also in the cc section your colleague David Enrich who stopped communicating with me prior to you making your presence known and obviously he kept the knowledge I was sharing with him from you.
I have also been Tweeting Enrich as well as the other co-authors and Im sure you will be able to locate those Tweets.
It is not everyday that the top-notch journalists working for global branded New York Times find themselves in the “hot spot” especially after exposing one of the darkest, most frightening aspects of the law profession as these “white shoes” heavy hitting lawyers affording the fanciest of offices screw over left and right their victims of the worst crimes, molesting underage girls and everyone in high-society knows about it.
How come you didn’t point [out] in your article that Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz was not duty-bound by the legal professions “Code of ethics” to represent to Jeffrey Dershowitz.
Doesn’t that alone make him a douchebag?
Maybe you did, and I have just forgotten.
You also know that truck drivers don’t just stop at truck stops, they talk with one another over short wave and long wave radios and there is quite the camaraderie. They are also on social media.
This truck driver only has 117 odd facebook friends.
Once he finally recovers from his huge head trauma he can decide to continue burying his head in the sand or start approaching all 117 odd, less me of course, to figure out what makes each of them tick.
He also knows that at least one other of his facebook friends who is mutual friends with me did not choose to share this very important knowledge with him, and so he immediately knows where he stands with her.
If you have my mathematical-quantitive skills which are probably not as good as that of Elon Musk you can still run an algorithm to figure out the improbability of the entire human race deciding to stick their head in the sand.
While in course of preparing this equation since what else do you have to busy yourself with, you will realize that all of you sticking your head in the sand are not sharing equally in the financial rewards which the Oppenheimers-DAAC-Barclays-Deutche Bank-Deborah Sturman Esq. dish out to their most obedient.
A truck driver in the cold of northern Alberta, Canada has a long way to travel to say Washington DC and then seek a Constitutional Amendment allowing him to run for President of the United States, but he will still remember that Trudeau is prime minister of Canada.
As this truck driver goes through his 115 odd other facebook friends to find out what they know about the impact on human society when the world’s wildly successful mineral monopolist rules the high seas, the land and the air including space exploration, he will also be thinking that it is only a question of time before those ignorant of the mineral extraction business get the information and start doing the same thing as him.
Obviously you have already begun doing all that with your colleagues and editors of the New York Times since what else have you been doing all this time?
It is only now that I suggested that you bring out your slide-rule.
if it will help you create that algorithm. The above photo was sent to me by Rothwell of his slide-rule which he created, just to let you know that even economists have down time.
Bear in mind that when just turning 21 years of age, back in early spring 1978, I learned firsthand from the head of the DAAC, Harry Oppenheimer that each one of my university professors at the University of Natal-Kwazulu, South Africa had been carefully monitored and getting them to follow the economics text books didn’t cost Oppenheimer-DAAC a penny, and if it had then still the cost of any bribe was a flat zero.
That did not mean that Harry Oppenheimer had a high regard for university professors.
The same could also be said about economic Nobel laureates such as Milton Friedman who also didn’t come with his hand out, the same of course with all the DAAC’s bought politicians going back well before President John F. Kennedy.
Put yourself in Harry Oppenheimer and his father Sir Ernest Oppenheimer’s shoes, and not wasting a moment after escaping prosecution at Nuremberg both for their war crimes and treason, you too would test the waters to see if your puppets would take a bribe and each of them knowing that they couldn’t refuse.
Wouldn’t you also derive great satisfaction when each of them took a pittance bribe?
Really, the human imagination is quite extraordinary.
It allows you for example without shaving your legs, to imagine each brushstroke.
How little imagination if you are a professor of economics at an Ivy league school or London School of Economics, or Cambridge or Oxford University to say thank you after being handed by Harry Oppenheimer or one of his emissaries a small diamond worth just a couple of grand and knowing you are being photographed, and only Harry Oppenheimer and the photographer being any the wiser?
So you must be asking yourselves where is God in all this?
Where is there any evidence that the biggest crooks who obviously have no conscience get their ultimate comeuppance, when it is the poor who are shafted left and right?
Nor can one argue that the poor are just too stupid to know any better and that their laziness makes you sick to your stomach.
I don’t see in your article anything about Boise and Pottinger being lazy.
Therefore it is right to leave God-Higher Energy Reaction [HER] out of the equation.
What if us humans are not all that smart after all, and think nothing is going to change because the status quo has remained for thousands of years?
Instead we are wrong in thinking that there is not one household name politician-media person-billionaire who won’t step forward to end this musical circus game?
I would assume that you are around 40 years of age like David Enrich. You have many years ahead of you to get sick which brings on the natural ugly looks that the healthy instinctively repel from.
Wouldn’t it be great if mathematician-philosopher David Berlinski would be the one to end all this nonsense?
What about Elon Musk now having to contend in the midst of all his work with this defamation lawsuit which everyone knows is about the money and therefore it isn't going to negatively impact Musk’s reputation?
Imagine the number of people salivating, “I hope he is going to have to pay through the nose”.
Yes, incredible how long it took you to finally admit that you didn’t recognize Oppenheimer.
You should also follow that there is a copycat defamation accuser on facebook who is accusing me of defamation publicly but without providing the statements of defamation; simply writing:
if you don’t stop using my name for what ever purpose I have already instructed my lawyer to sue u for defamation...I am warning you to stop advertising my name and using me for unfair discrimination … So don’t comment… It is not false it is on face book for every one to see… He [his lawyer [Walter Kasimov] will contact you shortly with a summons
South African Jeff Reichman does not say what I am advertising either. He has been in the diamond business his entire lifetime as his ties with the DAAC-Oppenheimers extend back generations. He had previously responded to me on facebook messaging, "I know the book a load of rubbish …” after I asked if he had simply heard of Professor Edward J Epstein’s epic non-fiction novel, The Diamond Invention, and why he thought it was available free on the internet?
The fact that I have not previously mentioned the earth-shattering The D I book to you which causes most everyone to shut down and show their true character, does not prevent you from also getting up to speed on what a great many people already know.
You are finding out very quickly with a lot of life left in you that the world is mostly ugly and very cruel especially to the poor and those few of us wanting to level the playing field who offer concrete solutions without murdering the poor.
I suggest that you have long talks with Dr. Geoffrey Rothwell Phd who knows a lot. His knowledge is not weakened by all the journalists around the world who specialize in the nuclear area but when confronted with the truth that all opposition to nuclear weapons development had been wiped out totally and that would include folks like Greenpeace, Venus Project, Zeitgeist blah blah, each one of them decided to play ostrich.
https://edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/chap4.htm
Nor do I expect the ongoing, premeditated murder of my British citizen mother Zena over in Israel to phase any of you in the least.
The only spark I see remaining is Elon Musk.
How can you have such a boring, monotonous, filled with jealousy, cruel beyond belief, stupid, and when not each or all of those negative attributes completely indifferent against a backdrop of perfect, beautiful nature; and out of nowhere comes this TESLA vehicle and it only brings on snide comments from the herd.
That too might be changing as his Cybertruck grips every truck driver’s imagination.
Be inspired Elon Musk; we are not alone; and therefore no need to rush.
Coincidences don’t come around for no reason; and to plan the food ahead of all creation and the positioning of the body parts no less totally imaginative, and yet the human is so stubborn once filled with jealousy, and destructive of everything around it.
So easy to imagine not just one extraordinary nuclear bomb accident but the corrupt leadership with their backs to the wall saying, “Why not?” and the generals feeling that much more empowered, knowing that the little guys wouldn’t do any differently.
We must however remain hopeful.
Tesla Vie,
Gary
[Word count 2922]
Original messaging:
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Nicholas Oppenheimer -Re: Judgment calls - Re: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 3, 2019 at 8:47:34 AM PST
To: "Silver-Greenberg, Jessica" <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com>
The item of utmost importance on Nicholas Oppenheimer's Wikipedia profile is that photo. The rest of the information is not immaterial even though it is totally misleading, and therefore it should not be dismissed because it is easy to figure out given its brevity the image Nicholas Oppenheimer-De Beers-Anglo American Corporation [DAAC] want to portray.
I did not place that photo up on his Wikipedia profile or for that matter any of the content. I did just happen to be checking it one day a few years ago and saw that it had been removed. I contacted Wikipedia to find out why and they told me that it had to do with a “licensing-copyright infringement” issue. I responded that the authorization came directly from the Kremlin based a on a letter which was provided on the Wikipedia page. It is still available. Wikipedia promptly replaced the photo.
That is all quite strange, is it not?
Had you seen when the NYT editors shared my enquiry my introduction, "I have information about the lawyers who know more about the Epstein story than they are letting on”?
Please also tell me about your formal education, in this way when we speak next it will be much easier for me to cut to the chase.
On Dec 3, 2019, at 8:03 AM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
I don't recognize the person on the right.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:51 AM Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you not see my introduction to you; namely, “I have information about the lawyers who know more about the Epstein story than they are letting on”?
Do you recognize the man on the right?
You of course know the man on the left who does not meet with just anyone to have a serious conversation.
You can see it is a serious conversation.
If you don’t recognize the man on the right how difficult is it for you to simply say that you don’t recognize him and then to ask the photographs relevance to the story that you are covering.
You know perfectly well that the story is not “done” unless you are concerned that the story behind that important meeting with Putin unravels your story and/or diminishes it significantly?
Have you already asked around to find out from colleagues or your editors if they are familiar with the photo.
You would expect me to be cautious given how you have spotlighted the corruption at the highest levels of lawyering-justice, and so why wouldn’t it extend to the journalist profession?
What is your educational background?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
Hi Gary,
I reached out to you because you wrote the editors at the New York Times asking to be put in touch. I don't know what you are talking about. I've already done the story, which you read.
If you have more information that you'd like to share, please let me know.
Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:35 AM Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Jessica, I notice that you don’t answer a simple question, do you recognize the man on the right whose father directly supervised my entry into the mafia of mafia?
Have you thought about the trail you are leaving behind?
You want me to talk so that you can say “He said-I said”?
Time-space is only important to us humans but it is of critical importance because it allows us to figure out who knew what and when and then make the best judgment calls.
On Dec 2, 2019, at 5:04 PM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Jessica, I am more than happy to talk with you because first of all I am honorable and because I am honorable I have nothing to hide, but first things first.
I also have all the information that you seek; moreover, your great article exposes the systemic lack of ethics in the legal profession which is news to most who see lawyering as an honorable profession; but to those who know the banking business and to know banking you have to be totally expert in the mining game, your revelations of the rot at the highest levels of the judiciary is anything but news.
Suffice to say few are experts at the mining game, and you probably know that Dershowitz has his hand in that, and possibly Boises but I don’t know about him.
Moreover those true experts do not talk, and they laugh a lot at those bankers such as George Soros, Warren Buffett etc etc who take themselves very seriously and yet until they got looped into the mining game they were clueless about it.
What your terrific article, albeit something in the order of 5,000 words plus back and forth text messages up the kazoo, lacks however is putting it all succinctly into one paragraph no more than 32 words long.
You of course realize that the attention span of most readers of The New York Times is extraordinarily small which doesn’t mean the rest who dont read and only watch TV are more knowledgeable.
Nor is it possible to have condensed your great article without losing its great flavor, not to mention its substance.
You must have a better idea than me what percent of college graduates who read your article understood it all perfectly?
Let’s say it is 1% given how to understand it perfectly you would have to read each and every word and most people simply don’t have the time for that. They have facebook to attend to as well as thinking about sex.
Those 1% by now, it has gone in one ear and out the next, other than those officials you mentioned by name. Of course people like Bill Clinton will have studied it like his life depended on it, but surely he is not your primary audience.
You want to reach every literate human on the planet and for them in short order to reach all those illiterate assuming access to them does not involve taking Musk’s Spaceship to Mars.
I also know the media game business very well having mastered long before I became the most trusted advisor to Randolph Apperson Hearst [1915-2000]
chairman of the board of Hearst Corporation at the peak of his power.
It is normally the “source-whistleblower” who is cagey in answering questions.
Please tell me if you recognize the man on the right in the photo of photos and that will have me much more inclined to have a conversation with you tomorrow.
Gary
[Word count 492]
On Dec 2, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
I did. Let’s talk tomorrow. My office is 212-556-7690
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:26 PM Eastern time Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you receive the photo I sent you earlier?
Sent from my iPhone
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 2, 2019 at 2:14:57 PM PST
To: "Silver-Greenberg, Jessica" <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com>
Jessica hi,
Im just heading out the door on a hike in a forest here in southern Callifornia but eager to get the ball rolling!
Do you recognize the man on the right?
His story is the real story; and with this photo alone and knowing the history behind it would bring all the lawyers and the politicians into reality check.
Talk to you soon.
Gary
On Dec 2, 2019, at 1:04 PM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
Hi Gary,
Jessica here. I'm one of the reporters on the Epstein/David Boies story.
I'd love to hear more.
You can reach me via email or by phone on my cell at 347-843-9767.
Thanks!
Jess
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Can you get me a job? -Re: Nicholas Oppenheimer -Re: Judgment calls - Re: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 3, 2019 at 3:08:57 PM PST
To: David.enrich@nytimes.com
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Can you get me a job? -Re: Nicholas Oppenheimer -Re: Judgment calls - Re: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 3, 2019 at 2:01:17 PM PST
To: "Silver-Greenberg, Jessica" <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com>
Cc: rest; David. Enrich" <david.enrich@dowjones.com>, "Geoffrey Rothwell - former principal economist for Nuclear Energy Agency housed within the OECD." <geoffreyrothwell@yahoo.com>, "Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. - Senior General Partner of Rosemont Realty, a subsidiary of Rosemont Capital." <jrk@classactionlaw.com>, "Deborah Sturman Esq. - replaced Kathy Gevisser Danziger as executor of Alan Zulman's estate on Zulman's death bed." <sturman@sturman.ch>, Ernest Rady <erady@americanassets.com>, "Joseph Steinberg - Chief Executive Officer of Luecadia National Corporation." <jsteinberg@sprintmail.com>, Jos Verhorst - Chairman De Amstel Club <josverhorst@amstelclub.nl>, Tim Page - British photo-journalist severely injured in Vietnam <timpagephoto@bigpond.com>, "Jeffrey Gilbert - Senior international slot machine executive; worked directly with Donald Trump and South African Gambling Czar Sol Kerzner and his deceased son, Butch." <jg@jesangil.com>, geoffrey.rothwell@turner-harris.com, George Soros <gsoros@sorosny.org>, "Matthew Margo - Senior attorney CBS - 60 Minutes. Matthew and I have known each other intimately since I headed up the restructuring team of Epilady USA Inc. starting back in late 1989." <matthewmargo@aol.com>, 60 Minutes <60m@cbsnews.com>, Vegetarian Tzipora Malka Tzipi Livni <zlivni@knesset.gov.il>, "Dr. Rod Smith Phd - formerly of RAND Think Tank - Principal Waterstrategist - Facebook friend of GG and also present at the Wetherly Capital Group board meeting on Feb. 8, 2002 held in the corporate headquarters of Arden Realty, the largest REIT trading on the New York Stock Exchange before being bought out by General Electric." <rsmith@stratwater.com>, Geoffrey van Leeuwen - Unchallenged Dutch Ambassador to Afghanistan <gvanleeuwen@yahoo.com>, "Peter van Leeuwen - Legal scholar and private university tutor." <repetitor@ziggo.nl>, "Israel Air Force Lt. Colonel Tomer Tene - Also Israel's largest organic produce farmer. ותומר טנא" <tene@arava.co.il>, "Stephen C. Meyer - Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the University of Cambridge." <smeyer@discovery.org>, David Hillel Gelernter - Professor of computer science Yale University <david.gelernter@yale.edu>, David Berlinski - very smart mathematician-philosopher <jdixon@discovery.org>, "MaryJane Schmidt - TESLA Customer Insights Analyst, Ownership Advocacy" <mschmidt@tesla.com>, Elon Musk <NAsales@tesla.com>
Jessica, it has been going [on] 4 hours since I let you into the darkest of dark secrets.
People do not care.
If one could find one honest politician or media person or religious figure of note who got up in front of the world’s cameras and told it the way it is, by simply holding up the photo of President Putin and Nick Oppenheimer, they would be killed, right?
At least that is probably the majority consensus.
More importantly, the thinking does not go beyond where a group of people caring about their children if no one else don’t make it their life’s work to expose these important truths which no one wants to hear because they feel so utterly stupid.
Realizing that they are not Elon Musk and haven’t done much with their lives to be proud [of] and most certainly not so fortunate to have a mother like mine who applauds me so and which the people all ignore because it does not suit them that my mother Zena is so demonstratively articulate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL4qdY7ESzE
preferring instead to see my mother Zena as “invisible”, and what better evidence of the vulgarity of the human than their silent comments on The Lady’s Speech.
Deafening silences speak volumes.
It is much more than the human has no shame.
What social media provides and which the DAAC architects of the Diamond Invention Game [DIG] never envisioned when putting the pieces in place to allow Germany to arise from the ashes of World War I, was that even the most poorly educated can be stopped dead in their tracks and revisit their brainwashing.
Let me give you one example.
At 9:10 AM Calif. I began a facebook messaging conversation with one of my 1324 facebook friends:
Gary:
What do you do?
I write on the economy.
Facebook friend:
Where are you from
Gary:
Born and raised in South Africa; so what do you do?
Fb friend:
I run Equipment and drive heavy haul trucks . Here in Northern Alberta Canada
Gary:
Do you work for a mining company?
I used to work for De Beers-Anglo American Corporation [DAAC]. Have you heard of them?
Fb friend:
No right now I am driving for a fuel Company hauling fuel . De- Beers Diamond mines ??
Gary:
Yes De Beers diamond mining ++++
How well do you know our mutual facebook friend X X?
Fb fried:
Excellent can you get me a job ?
Gary:
Most unlikely. I am quite the thorn in their side.
Fb friend:
Lol
Alberta is going down the tubes economically . Thanks to our Communist Prime minister Justin Trudeau
Gary:
You probably never thought that Trudeau was bought by the most capitalist enterprise on the planet.
Do you associate monopolies with communism or capitalism or socialism?
How much formal schooling do you have?
Remember my question about X?
Fb friend:
Trade school and 9 years army out of school .
10:19 AM Calif. time
Gary:
What branch of the services, and what rank did you achieve?
Jessica, notice that he was stumped by my question, "Do you associate monopolies with communism or capitalism or socialism?”, and could you fault my lead in?
You are also capable of imagining how his future writings expressed the enormity of the calamity when instantly realizing that he got suckered into thinking that there is any difference amongst the politicians, the political parties, and most of all the different economic systems.
Imagine which people would profit from floating the idea that we should be aware of a New World Order run by global corporations?
Imagine all the world’s professors and teachers not digging further even though they all know that it takes raw materials such as water, uranium, copper, iron, coal etc to produce other materials and eventually finished goods.
Imagine all the world’s intellectuals never figuring out the logical insanity and moral depravity of the Gross Domestic Product index and there have never been so many humans on this planet who can’t blame their handheld computing devices for such mass stupidity.
It is no less difficult to imagine how if this fuel truck driver and my dialogue coupled with your and my dialogue were to be displayed on a large screen before first year psychology, economics, business, finance, journalism and law students attending their first lecture at university there would be no need for the lecturer to bother showing their face.
How quickly do you think word would spread throughout the university campus?
Your guess is as good as mine.
Now you can see that I'm introducing you to economist Dr. Geoffrey Rothwell Phd, the former principal economist for the Nuclear Energy Agency-OECD who once he became acquainted with the photo of Putin and Oppenheimer made it his business to join the beast and that took a few years.
Much more importantly 6 months after getting the most important job of his career, moving to Paris and becoming instantly the most important American on the European continent, Rothwell contacted me - see ABOUT section of 2facetruth.com - to let me know in no uncertain terms that his NEA-OECD had effectively wiped out all opposition to nuclear weapons development.
Despite directing me to nuclear opposition website that went nowhere, I didn’t simply leave it [at] that because I am a conscious being.
When we met for dinner in Paris, along with our respective wives some 2 months and 22 days later [September 16, 2013], I wasted no time in asking Rothwell the military component in his mathematical equations which had him projecting the cost of enriched uranium which impressed his future bosses at the NEA-OECD.
Let’s just say the rest of the dinner conversation was interesting.
You are not lost as you have previously said, "I don't know what you are talking about” because at the very start of my response to your email that I should call you this morning I wrote something that sparked your mind, "to know banking you have to be totally expert in the mining game” which I know was not covered in your university education or at any time before or since.
Yet it is common sense.
Everyone thinks they have common sense and furthermore that it is others who are ignorant, not them.
When they find out that they are totally ignorant about all the things they sprout forth from their mouths they write the same old trash:
We are all slaves our societies have been destroyed starting with the basic building blocks of the family unit . Most people are slaves to debt which I'd better because traditional slaves are kept by the slave owners . We have to feed and clothe ourselves
BTW, David Enrich showed no interest in me introducing him to Dr. Geoffrey Rothwell Phd.
Let me emphasize. The people do not care.
The people do not care that nuclear radiation kills because they have other things more important on their minds such as covering up their wrongdoing and paying for things like rent, mortgages, food, clothing, beer, bullets for the guns to shoot game and so on and so forth.
As a curious human being wouldn’t you be interested to see how the rest of the conversation with this fuel truck driver continues or have I painted a sufficiently good picture?
Notice also in the cc section your colleague David Enrich who stopped communicating with me prior to you making your presence known and obviously he kept the knowledge I was sharing with him from you.
I have also been Tweeting Enrich as well as the other co-authors and Im sure you will be able to locate those Tweets.
It is not everyday that the top-notch journalists working for global branded New York Times find themselves in the “hot spot” especially after exposing one of the darkest, most frightening aspects of the law profession as these “white shoes” heavy hitting lawyers affording the fanciest of offices screw over left and right their victims of the worst crimes, molesting underage girls and everyone in high-society knows about it.
How come you didn’t point [out] in your article that Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz was not duty-bound by the legal professions “Code of ethics” to represent to Jeffrey Dershowitz.
Doesn’t that alone make him a douchebag?
Maybe you did, and I have just forgotten.
You also know that truck drivers don’t just stop at truck stops, they talk with one another over short wave and long wave radios and there is quite the camaraderie. They are also on social media.
This truck driver only has 117 odd facebook friends.
Once he finally recovers from his huge head trauma he can decide to continue burying his head in the sand or start approaching all 117 odd, less me of course, to figure out what makes each of them tick.
He also knows that at least one other of his facebook friends who is mutual friends with me did not choose to share this very important knowledge with him, and so he immediately knows where he stands with her.
If you have my mathematical-quantitive skills which are probably not as good as that of Elon Musk you can still run an algorithm to figure out the improbability of the entire human race deciding to stick their head in the sand.
While in course of preparing this equation since what else do you have to busy yourself with, you will realize that all of you sticking your head in the sand are not sharing equally in the financial rewards which the Oppenheimers-DAAC-Barclays-Deutche Bank-Deborah Sturman Esq. dish out to their most obedient.
A truck driver in the cold of northern Alberta, Canada has a long way to travel to say Washington DC and then seek a Constitutional Amendment allowing him to run for President of the United States, but he will still remember that Trudeau is prime minister of Canada.
As this truck driver goes through his 115 odd other facebook friends to find out what they know about the impact on human society when the world’s wildly successful mineral monopolist rules the high seas, the land and the air including space exploration, he will also be thinking that it is only a question of time before those ignorant of the mineral extraction business get the information and start doing the same thing as him.
Obviously you have already begun doing all that with your colleagues and editors of the New York Times since what else have you been doing all this time?
It is only now that I suggested that you bring out your slide-rule.
if it will help you create that algorithm. The above photo was sent to me by Rothwell of his slide-rule which he created, just to let you know that even economists have down time.
Bear in mind that when just turning 21 years of age, back in early spring 1978, I learned firsthand from the head of the DAAC, Harry Oppenheimer that each one of my university professors at the University of Natal-Kwazulu, South Africa had been carefully monitored and getting them to follow the economics text books didn’t cost Oppenheimer-DAAC a penny, and if it had then still the cost of any bribe was a flat zero.
That did not mean that Harry Oppenheimer had a high regard for university professors.
The same could also be said about economic Nobel laureates such as Milton Friedman who also didn’t come with his hand out, the same of course with all the DAAC’s bought politicians going back well before President John F. Kennedy.
Put yourself in Harry Oppenheimer and his father Sir Ernest Oppenheimer’s shoes, and not wasting a moment after escaping prosecution at Nuremberg both for their war crimes and treason, you too would test the waters to see if your puppets would take a bribe and each of them knowing that they couldn’t refuse.
Wouldn’t you also derive great satisfaction when each of them took a pittance bribe?
Really, the human imagination is quite extraordinary.
It allows you for example without shaving your legs, to imagine each brushstroke.
How little imagination if you are a professor of economics at an Ivy league school or London School of Economics, or Cambridge or Oxford University to say thank you after being handed by Harry Oppenheimer or one of his emissaries a small diamond worth just a couple of grand and knowing you are being photographed, and only Harry Oppenheimer and the photographer being any the wiser?
So you must be asking yourselves where is God in all this?
Where is there any evidence that the biggest crooks who obviously have no conscience get their ultimate comeuppance, when it is the poor who are shafted left and right?
Nor can one argue that the poor are just too stupid to know any better and that their laziness makes you sick to your stomach.
I don’t see in your article anything about Boise and Pottinger being lazy.
Therefore it is right to leave God-Higher Energy Reaction [HER] out of the equation.
What if us humans are not all that smart after all, and think nothing is going to change because the status quo has remained for thousands of years?
Instead we are wrong in thinking that there is not one household name politician-media person-billionaire who won’t step forward to end this musical circus game?
I would assume that you are around 40 years of age like David Enrich. You have many years ahead of you to get sick which brings on the natural ugly looks that the healthy instinctively repel from.
Wouldn’t it be great if mathematician-philosopher David Berlinski would be the one to end all this nonsense?
What about Elon Musk now having to contend in the midst of all his work with this defamation lawsuit which everyone knows is about the money and therefore it isn't going to negatively impact Musk’s reputation?
Imagine the number of people salivating, “I hope he is going to have to pay through the nose”.
Yes, incredible how long it took you to finally admit that you didn’t recognize Oppenheimer.
You should also follow that there is a copycat defamation accuser on facebook who is accusing me of defamation publicly but without providing the statements of defamation; simply writing:
if you don’t stop using my name for what ever purpose I have already instructed my lawyer to sue u for defamation...I am warning you to stop advertising my name and using me for unfair discrimination … So don’t comment… It is not false it is on face book for every one to see… He [his lawyer [Walter Kasimov] will contact you shortly with a summons
South African Jeff Reichman does not say what I am advertising either. He has been in the diamond business his entire lifetime as his ties with the DAAC-Oppenheimers extend back generations. He had previously responded to me on facebook messaging, "I know the book a load of rubbish …” after I asked if he had simply heard of Professor Edward J Epstein’s epic non-fiction novel, The Diamond Invention, and why he thought it was available free on the internet?
The fact that I have not previously mentioned the earth-shattering The D I book to you which causes most everyone to shut down and show their true character, does not prevent you from also getting up to speed on what a great many people already know.
You are finding out very quickly with a lot of life left in you that the world is mostly ugly and very cruel especially to the poor and those few of us wanting to level the playing field who offer concrete solutions without murdering the poor.
I suggest that you have long talks with Dr. Geoffrey Rothwell Phd who knows a lot. His knowledge is not weakened by all the journalists around the world who specialize in the nuclear area but when confronted with the truth that all opposition to nuclear weapons development had been wiped out totally and that would include folks like Greenpeace, Venus Project, Zeitgeist blah blah, each one of them decided to play ostrich.
https://edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/chap4.htm
Nor do I expect the ongoing, premeditated murder of my British citizen mother Zena over in Israel to phase any of you in the least.
The only spark I see remaining is Elon Musk.
How can you have such a boring, monotonous, filled with jealousy, cruel beyond belief, stupid, and when not each or all of those negative attributes completely indifferent against a backdrop of perfect, beautiful nature; and out of nowhere comes this TESLA vehicle and it only brings on snide comments from the herd.
That too might be changing as his Cybertruck grips every truck driver’s imagination.
Be inspired Elon Musk; we are not alone; and therefore no need to rush.
Coincidences don’t come around for no reason; and to plan the food ahead of all creation and the positioning of the body parts no less totally imaginative, and yet the human is so stubborn once filled with jealousy, and destructive of everything around it.
So easy to imagine not just one extraordinary nuclear bomb accident but the corrupt leadership with their backs to the wall saying, “Why not?” and the generals feeling that much more empowered, knowing that the little guys wouldn’t do any differently.
We must however remain hopeful.
Tesla Vie,
Gary
[Word count 2922]
Original messaging:
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Nicholas Oppenheimer -Re: Judgment calls - Re: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 3, 2019 at 8:47:34 AM PST
To: "Silver-Greenberg, Jessica" <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com>
The item of utmost importance on Nicholas Oppenheimer's Wikipedia profile is that photo. The rest of the information is not immaterial even though it is totally misleading, and therefore it should not be dismissed because it is easy to figure out given its brevity the image Nicholas Oppenheimer-De Beers-Anglo American Corporation [DAAC] want to portray.
I did not place that photo up on his Wikipedia profile or for that matter any of the content. I did just happen to be checking it one day a few years ago and saw that it had been removed. I contacted Wikipedia to find out why and they told me that it had to do with a “licensing-copyright infringement” issue. I responded that the authorization came directly from the Kremlin based a on a letter which was provided on the Wikipedia page. It is still available. Wikipedia promptly replaced the photo.
That is all quite strange, is it not?
Had you seen when the NYT editors shared my enquiry my introduction, "I have information about the lawyers who know more about the Epstein story than they are letting on”?
Please also tell me about your formal education, in this way when we speak next it will be much easier for me to cut to the chase.
On Dec 3, 2019, at 8:03 AM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
I don't recognize the person on the right.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:51 AM Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you not see my introduction to you; namely, “I have information about the lawyers who know more about the Epstein story than they are letting on”?
Do you recognize the man on the right?
You of course know the man on the left who does not meet with just anyone to have a serious conversation.
You can see it is a serious conversation.
If you don’t recognize the man on the right how difficult is it for you to simply say that you don’t recognize him and then to ask the photographs relevance to the story that you are covering.
You know perfectly well that the story is not “done” unless you are concerned that the story behind that important meeting with Putin unravels your story and/or diminishes it significantly?
Have you already asked around to find out from colleagues or your editors if they are familiar with the photo.
You would expect me to be cautious given how you have spotlighted the corruption at the highest levels of lawyering-justice, and so why wouldn’t it extend to the journalist profession?
What is your educational background?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
Hi Gary,
I reached out to you because you wrote the editors at the New York Times asking to be put in touch. I don't know what you are talking about. I've already done the story, which you read.
If you have more information that you'd like to share, please let me know.
Thanks.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:35 AM Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Jessica, I notice that you don’t answer a simple question, do you recognize the man on the right whose father directly supervised my entry into the mafia of mafia?
Have you thought about the trail you are leaving behind?
You want me to talk so that you can say “He said-I said”?
Time-space is only important to us humans but it is of critical importance because it allows us to figure out who knew what and when and then make the best judgment calls.
On Dec 2, 2019, at 5:04 PM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Jessica, I am more than happy to talk with you because first of all I am honorable and because I am honorable I have nothing to hide, but first things first.
I also have all the information that you seek; moreover, your great article exposes the systemic lack of ethics in the legal profession which is news to most who see lawyering as an honorable profession; but to those who know the banking business and to know banking you have to be totally expert in the mining game, your revelations of the rot at the highest levels of the judiciary is anything but news.
Suffice to say few are experts at the mining game, and you probably know that Dershowitz has his hand in that, and possibly Boises but I don’t know about him.
Moreover those true experts do not talk, and they laugh a lot at those bankers such as George Soros, Warren Buffett etc etc who take themselves very seriously and yet until they got looped into the mining game they were clueless about it.
What your terrific article, albeit something in the order of 5,000 words plus back and forth text messages up the kazoo, lacks however is putting it all succinctly into one paragraph no more than 32 words long.
You of course realize that the attention span of most readers of The New York Times is extraordinarily small which doesn’t mean the rest who dont read and only watch TV are more knowledgeable.
Nor is it possible to have condensed your great article without losing its great flavor, not to mention its substance.
You must have a better idea than me what percent of college graduates who read your article understood it all perfectly?
Let’s say it is 1% given how to understand it perfectly you would have to read each and every word and most people simply don’t have the time for that. They have facebook to attend to as well as thinking about sex.
Those 1% by now, it has gone in one ear and out the next, other than those officials you mentioned by name. Of course people like Bill Clinton will have studied it like his life depended on it, but surely he is not your primary audience.
You want to reach every literate human on the planet and for them in short order to reach all those illiterate assuming access to them does not involve taking Musk’s Spaceship to Mars.
I also know the media game business very well having mastered long before I became the most trusted advisor to Randolph Apperson Hearst [1915-2000]
chairman of the board of Hearst Corporation at the peak of his power.
It is normally the “source-whistleblower” who is cagey in answering questions.
Please tell me if you recognize the man on the right in the photo of photos and that will have me much more inclined to have a conversation with you tomorrow.
Gary
[Word count 492]
On Dec 2, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
I did. Let’s talk tomorrow. My office is 212-556-7690
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:26 PM Eastern time Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you receive the photo I sent you earlier?
Sent from my iPhone
From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Man on the right - Re: Following up
Date: December 2, 2019 at 2:14:57 PM PST
To: "Silver-Greenberg, Jessica" <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com>
Jessica hi,
Im just heading out the door on a hike in a forest here in southern Callifornia but eager to get the ball rolling!
Do you recognize the man on the right?
His story is the real story; and with this photo alone and knowing the history behind it would bring all the lawyers and the politicians into reality check.
Talk to you soon.
Gary
On Dec 2, 2019, at 1:04 PM, Silver-Greenberg, Jessica <jessica.silvergreenberg@nytimes.com> wrote:
Hi Gary,
Jessica here. I'm one of the reporters on the Epstein/David Boies story.
I'd love to hear more.
You can reach me via email or by phone on my cell at 347-843-9767.
Thanks!
Jess
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
--
Jessica Silver-Greenberg
New York Times
(212) 556-7690 (O)
(347) 843-9767 (C)
