Children – Part II
CHILDREN 1 – CLICK HERE
Screenshot 1:18 PM, Sunday 23 January 2022
-
-
- · Reply · 3d
Tania Steyn
Sharon Fleischmann – my goodness. Is this man in an Institution?
-
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 3d
Olive LG
Tania Steyn or needs to be institutionalized. Seems he misses the concept of engagement. Nobody really reads monologues
Like
· Reply · 3d
Active
Gary Gevisser
Tania Steyn how many times have we heard this one when they have no brain power, intellectual midgets?We are not interested in dating you or your bathroom routine or making money out of you, selling you something.
Like
· Reply · 2d
Active
Gary Gevisser
Olive LG what do you talk about anyway?It is not like you have an original thought.
Like
· Reply · 2d
ActiveGary Gevisser
I didnt read that. Did I read that? Sometimes I forget. I wont read it again though, just in case. Plausible deniability, don’t they use that a lot. It must be the popular word and gone up exponentially over the past few years.
Like
· Reply · 2d
- 1
-
Active
Write a reply…
Olive LG
It boils down to the fact that the true AGITATOR has ALWAYS be the British who’ve only moved their involvementto monitary after 94. A fact that likes to be hidden in land or apartheid discussion
- 1
Like
· Reply · 3d · Edited
Olive LG
Rian Geldenhuys haven’t read your posts in a while but the libwokies in the Cape seems to be up in arms. Are there ANY centrists left down there ?Wondering if their far left leanings has to do with appeasing the tourists ? Or what is going on that they cant face historical facts ?
- 1
Like
· Reply · 3d · Edited
Rian Geldenhuys
Olive LG it is to appease the arsonists. Ironically the author and main sponsor of the 1913 Natives Land Act was a Cape libwokie named JW Sauer.
Like
· Reply · 3d
ActiveGary Gevisser
Rian Geldenhuys, did you remove your earlier writings directed at me as well as my response?At 5:05 AM Calif. time I did backup:
Rian Geldenhuys
:
Gary Gevisser tell us about Jan Smuts, Ernest, Harry and the Anglican Church. Then detail the diamond trade history. Briefly explain what you would suggest we do about all of this right now.Like
· Reply · 5h
Gary Gevisser
Rian Geldenhuys it is 4:18 in California where I am right now.
I see your response above “Gary Gevisser tell us about Jan Smuts, Ernest, Harry and the Anglican Church. Then detail the diamond trade history. Briefly explain what you would suggest we do about all of this right now” from yesterday, Saturday, 22 January 2022 at 11:16 PM.
I’m up earlier than usual because there were a couple of items I needed to take care of including monitoring the upload on to Youtube of video I shot yesterday which I’m certain you are going to find very entertaining as will Elon Musk.
Those matters have been “put to bed” and I am now going back to sleep to await the arrival of the birds who are much more important than most people think because most people live in cities which chase away the birds and the few remaining, the numb people pay little attention to.
You and everyone who knows me including my former clients such as multi-billionaire Solly Krok who could afford to hire less expensive consultants than me but then you pay for what you get when you surround yourself with “Yes men” who, to repeat, are those who “get you killed”, know that I don’t talk to talk.
I take your question in the most positive vein even if it turns out that you are not really listening and have another agenda, because others will learn from your most excellent, succinct question, as they demonstrate a logical chain of thought that is most uncommon once people start reading Professor Edward Jay Epstein’s 1978 epic non-fiction book, The Diamond Invention which future clients of mine, Simon & Schuster published in 1982, and prior to that S & S would have conducted extensive focus groups, at the behest of Harry Oppenheimer, in order to gauge the people’s reaction.
Back on Monday, 17 January at 3:50 PM Calif. time, I provided a link to The D I book.
If you had never heard of it, still given my transparent knowledge that is rather unique, you should have started reading it and completing the first read in no more than 3 hours if you are fluent in English. It might take you longer only because this very well written page-turner book is so captivating even if you are not all that interested in history or money because it details unprecidented gun-money power that you won’t find anywhere else.
So I will assume Rian that you have at least glanced through the book and been blown away, all the while helping you compose your good question.
If I am wrong, then by the time I turn my laptop back on which will be about 4 hours from now, you will let me know how far you have got which will allow me to know that much more certain where your head is at.
Bear in mind that Smuts’ name isn’t mentioned all that much, possibly only once, because ever since his death on 11 September 1950, the SA Oppenheimers have been pulling out all stops to remove his name from the history books; but if you know where to look, you will understand perfectly why they feared him.
In other words, Smuts whose first employer was Cecil Rhodes, founder of De Beers, was no fool.
Also feel free to write down any questions you have about the book which I only came across in late 2003 when doing an assignment for America’s richest and most powerful sharehold class action litigator, Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. and is in most tight with both the Biden and John F. Kerry Esq. families.
To mention in passing, it was Mr. JRK Esq. who filed the epic class action lawsuit against Ronald O. Perelman and his Revlon Corporation on 1 October 1999, no doubt motivated by the Love That Pink – Revlon Make Up Chart cartoon, the brainchild of my highly literate, worldly British-English mother Zena who was a household name in South Africa for 3 decades.
Not to mention, the first time scholarly Professor Epstein met with Harry Oppenheimer, December 4, 1978 – see chapter 1, A RELUCTANT TYCOON – I was just completing my year long orientation into the world’s only wildly successful mineral-banking monopoly De Beers-Barclays Bank-Uranium One-Anglo American Corporation which was directly supervised by Harry Oppenheimer who knew that I wasn’t the dumbest student to have graduated from the University of Kwazulu-Natal.
3m
Like
· Reply · 55m
ActiveGary Gevisser
Title: Healthy kidRian Geldenhuys, 36 minutes have elapsed since I reposted the backup above of our public discourse.
It is now 1 PM Calif. time, Sunday, 23 January 2022.
Again, if it turns out that you have an agenda other than the search for truth, it makes no difference to me because I will move this “courseware” on to other platforms.
It is your choice how you wish your legacy.
The deception of the human is unknown to other animals, insects and the such unless like water which has memory, they know everything, and are simply programmed perfectly to guide each of us according to our prior actions and thoughts.
That should encourage some to stay in the moment and others not.
What is not however in doubt is all this false concern for the children who are the first sacrificed in war.
You brought up the Anglican Church which despite all its nexus with the Bank of England did bring civility with tea breaks so important to the game of cricket and which the French lack as much as they protest otherwise. Drinking wine doesn’t make you more articulate.
BTW, when you have dined twice in the space of less than 12 hours with the Director of Versailles and there are only 4 persons communicating, Hubert Astier, myself and our respective wives as our host wasn’t deaf, dumb or blind as she quietly served our meals, you pretty much know how much in need of revamping is their educational curriculum.
If the people at the very top have got it all wrong, you can’t expect better from those buying into all their crap.
Yes, Jan Christiaan Smuts had no problem with the Anglican Church when his option was to seek an accomodation with the Germans which would have meant the end of not only all the Jewish people, but each and every black African tribe were they to resist like the Herero and Nama.
Not to mention, very well rounded and worldly Smuts, were he to be around or watching from above, he would see that not much has changed except that there are more players.
Before I go on, you should provide your educational background and life experience.
This is the way civilized people conduct themselves in a two-way street as much as those attacking me for their lack of intellect, shock at waking up to how they have been horribly manipulated protest their innocence and my comback “I didnt read that. Did I read that? Sometimes I forget. I wont read it again though, just in case”, increasingly making them angry with themselves for their weak sarcasm and therefore unsure of themselves. Nor will their happiness with themselves improve as they age poorly, because that is what mental suicide logically dictates.
Why, other than you are out of your league would you talk a lot but have nothing to say other than what you regurgitate?
Worth repeating, “When the dialogue becomes two monologues it is the beginning of the end”, my gorgeous wife’s thinking; and thin is what every kid wants to see in their parent, you just have to ask the healthy kid.
Like
· Reply · 6m
