Criirad legitimate – Re: Réponse automatique : As soon as possible Fwd: Investec

From: GaryStevenGevisser <garystevengevisser>
Subject: Re: Criirad legitimate – Re: Réponse automatique : As soon as possible Fwd: Investec
Date: May 5, 2016 at 7:02:11 PM GMT+3
To: “Geoffrey.ROTHWELL” <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL>

that was far too vague.

How would you, if you were me, write to Criiad to get them to wake up?

Do you see anything in their literature that talks to weapons development behind all nuclear that drives everything that is wrong in this world?

I haven’t and I have looked. I’ve also looked at their financial statements that they make public and there are some disturbing items; but the money side is my area of expertise.

I want you to tell me what to write, using simple English to explain the rest; namely how they have completely missed the boat when warning the public about the increasing emissions from nuclear power plants without explaining that the emissions serve as nothing more than a smokescreen for uncontrolled nuclear weapons proliferation.

Im going for a run with Mango as Marie comes to the end of his warm up on the bed.

BTW, Marie had a great dream last night, that I will share with you later.

On May 5, 2016, at 5:32 PM, <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL> <Geoffrey.ROTHWELL> wrote:

I need to read their literature and find an area of common interest. It isn’t obvious whether they are interested the the economics of safety or nonproliferation. As a fall back, I did notice that they have done something on Hanford. So if I can’t find any common scientific/professional interests, I can find common personal interests!