Pages Navigation Menu
Categories Navigation Menu

British historian Edward Lucas – Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War

From: Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>

Subject: Wrong analysis – Re: Plausible answer – Re: Im watching you on a Youtube video debating WW1
Date: November 12, 2018 at 2:10:43 PM PST
To: Edward Lucas <el@edwardlucas.com>
Cc: rest;Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. – Senior General Partner of Rosemont Realty, a subsidiary of Rosemont Capital.” <jrk@classactionlaw.com>, “Dr. Rod Smith Phd – formerly of RAND Think Tank – Principal Waterstrategist – Facebook friend of GG and also present at the Wetherly Capital Group board meeting on Feb. 8, 2002 held in the corporate headquarters of Arden Realty, the largest REIT trading on the New York Stock Exchange before being bought out by General Electric.” <rsmith@stratwater.com>, Benjamin Netanyahu – Prime Minister of Israel <bnetanyahu@knesset.gov.il>, “Tomer – Israeli farmer and former Israel Air Force [IAF] pilot ותומר טנא” <tene@arava.co.il>, British Embassy – Israel <enquiries.consular@fco.gov.uk>, “Gary Barber – former CEO of MGM – on Ulpan-Gadna training with Gary Gevisser 1972. Barber owner of racehorse , WONDER GADOT.” <gbspyglass@gmail.com>, Jos Verhorst – Chairman De Amstel Club <josverhorst@amstelclub.nl>, “Matthew Margo – Senior attorney CBS – 60 Minutes. Matthew and I have known each other intimately since I headed up the restructuring team of Epilady USA Inc. starting back in late 1989.” <matthewmargo@aol.com>, “Megan Ellison – Film producer [Detroit] and only daughter of $60 billionaire Larry Ellison” <contact@annapurnainteractive.com>, 60 Minutes <60m@cbsnews.com>

You sound like you want to censor me and prevent very critical information reaching, not simply those who buy your books, but a great many more who suffer from war and tyranny as a result of wrong analysis of previous conflicts.

 

Yes, you know exactly what this is about.

 
You don’t like the fact that you contradicted yourself, and you haven’t been able to figure a way out, other than to be so ungentlemanlike, quite different to your TV debating persona.
 
You are a sore loser.
 
This is also bigger than you.
 
Shame on you.

 

On Nov 12, 2018, at 12:57 AM, Edward Lucas <el@edwardlucas.com> wrote:

I have no idea what this is about but I can’t help you further. Please don’t write again. Thanks EL

 

On 12 Nov 2018, at 03:11, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

Edward, since I have a good 5 years on you and I feel okay to call you by your first name, you couldn’t have got rattled by Siri picking up “babies” instead of Navy plural; and I have now “surrounded” the “babies” with the appropriate sic; the same with the misspelling of “Luftwaffe”.

 
Nor do I want to get into a debate with you about why we should or shouldn’t be looking more at physical-mental health than biological age because first of all that is off subject; and second that could result in an endless debate and during this wasteful time period neither of us would be getting any younger and a truck could come by and get us killed, and if there is an “afterlife” would we really bother with continuing the debate?
 
Instead, we should focus on your response which I find bizarre; but at the same time, I haven’t been able to find elsewhere a close to respectable answer to how Germany rearmed; and believe me when I tell you that I have asked a great many more people than you, and they all draw a blank.
 
You also clearly understand that if there is not a plausible answer then it raises many questions including what have we really accomplished with all the debating revolving around WW1 and WW2 to mention little of the aftermath and its horrific wars, famines and the wretchedness we have embarked on perfect nature, not to mention the defenseless and impressionable children we keep bringing into this world; and could all our politicians also be so oblivious?
 
Gary

 

On Nov 11, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

I have now learned, thanks to Google, about the 3 nothing to speak of German pocket battleships which were built in accordance with the Versailles P T, so in fact the Germans did not break the VPT with these vessels.

 
My question remains, how did Germany overcome the strict prohibitions in the Versailles Peace Treaty from rearming?
 
A “Lufwaffe” [sic] second to none is not the same as 3 pitiful battleships which float atop the waters allowing our Allied “babies” [sic] and Air forces a birds eye view of everything below including who comes on board as well as what intelligence signals go back and forth
 
The architects of the VPT included some very brilliant people who were weary of Germany long before the outbreak of WW1
 
I actually thought you were talking money when you used the word “broke” as if to suggest that “small battleships” broke Germany’s treasury, but as you know the VPT made sure of that.
 
So how do you go from 3 pocket battleships to the most advanced mechanized military with the smartest generals on the Allied side watching you like hawks?

 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 11, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

small battleships? I’ve never heard the term “pocket battleships”, and Im pretty well educated.

On Nov 11, 2018, at 4:30 AM, Edward Lucas <el@edwardlucas.com> wrote:

broke them — eg with pocket battleships

 

On 10 Nov 2018, at 05:48, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

How did Germany overcome the strict prohibitions in the Versailles Peace Treaty from rearming?


Thank you,

Gary

Loading