Emperor ~ Charlie Robinson

 

I realize the world continues to spin and I’m talking about the entire universe, and there is still the minutia of every day living to contend with.

 

Despite your move, by now you would have, if firing on all cylinders, read Prof Edward Jay Epstein’s The D I book from cover to cover if not twice or more.

 

Moreover, the 1989 New York Times article I linked you to, Harry Oppenheimer’s Empire: Going for the Gold would have first been vetted by Oppenheimer, something you might not have previously given any thought.

 

Following the publication of that very important piece which illustrated not only how easy it was for this liberal to fire tens of thousands of his black South African slave wage earners but his entire control of the South African economy including the assets under the direct control of his Apartheid Regime numbering some $250 billion and able to eliminate all debt in a heartbeat, do you remember what underwear Prince Charles was wearing?

 

Just making sure you are awake.

 

Do you think Jeffrey Epstein if shared either that article or the contents of The D I book he would automatically forget the name Harry Oppenheimer?

 

Could you see Nick Oppenheimer keeping the secrets of The D I book from Jeffrey Epstein or any of Epstein’s entourage?

 

How do you think someone such as Jeffrey Epstein would react either to the article or The D I book?

 

If you were in favor with Jeffrey Epstein and aware of The D I book would you keep it from him?

 

Shouldn’t we move on from Jeffrey Epstein since he is dead?

 

I say no.

 

Rather we should enquire from everyone where they think Jeffrey Epstein got his money since this seems to be the question on everyone’s mind other than to forget altogether The D I book.

 

Btw how do think the BBC interviewer of Prince Andrew would have reacted right at the very end had he presented her with a hard copy of The D I and suggested she read it?

 

Could you see that New York Times article and The D I book opening or closing the door for Harry Oppenheimer?

 

Imagine if one of the witnesses before the commission investigating President Trump presented a copy of the article or simply began reading into the record the article do you think it would be a Republican or a Democrat who would interrupt?

 

You didn’t ask me if I thought my life was in danger or if since leaving the DAAC-Oppenheimer’s employment I had been threatened.

 

In case you didn’t already know, back on April 7, 2005, 4 months and 27 days after I broke my 24 year silence with the DAAC-Oppenheimers I received a very threatening email from their attorneys who were attempting to intimidate me with a defamation lawsuit if I continued to persevere in getting their media to place my DE BEERS INFORMERS WANTED ad.

 

In the YouTube video I saw of you being interviewed by this one British gentleman who appears to have somewhat of a following and I really know nothing about him, not even his name, the two of you were talking about using a mirror device to look under the vehicle for a pipe bomb of sorts.

 

You may think that there are a great many people out there who are more of a threat to this mafia of mafia who have their fingers in every aspect of all lives, but take my word for it, you would be wrong to think that.

 

So what does a journalist do once they realize that they bring nothing new to the table?

 

Playing for time is also boring as well as being self destructive.

 

A person such as Harry Oppenheimer who is able to convince President elect John F Kennedy to meet with him in a public setting such as the Carlyle Hotel in the presence of Kennedy’s Secret Service detail who are not robots and know like Kennedy that Harry Oppenheimer controls the world’s drilling holes ndustry and all the wars which surround the extraction of minerals including the refugee crisis which provides cheap labor for picking cotton and heads of lettuce while selling guns to the local law enforcement to contain the refugees in prisons when they get too boisterous, is not your usual businessman.

 

You would think that when Professors at prestigious universities like Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cornell, Wharton, London School of Economics, Cambridge and Oxford lecture on the subject of anti-Trust/Monopolies, they would not begin by explaining the role played by bees 🐝 in the pollination of our fruit trees.

 

Instead you would expect them to begin as follows:

 

Students, welcome to the most important subject ever taught following the Battle of Hastings which you all remember took place in 1066.

 

Our focus should not be the girl with the prettiest pair of legs unless there is a student here today who feels a little horny and would very much like to pick out her date for this coming Saturday night.

 

The reason for this distraction is that the moment I start detailing the business enterprises of South African Harry Oppenheimer and his DAAC – De beers-Anglo American Corporation my classes will begin thinning out quite different dramatically and I too wish to be remembered different to the rest of the stooges.

 

Charlie, there is a reason why Harry Oppenheimer’s name is never mentioned during the first lecture on how important and effective are the ant-Trust/anti-monopolies legislation.

 

The instant there is a run from the study of economics it is just a matter of time before word spreads to the law and political science lecture halls, and then where do bank officials run?

 

I’m a pretty good read of people.

 

Once I see them either in front of the camera or once they read The D I book and they go silent or attempt to distract, my antenna are naturally raised; moreover when it is me with great credibility and support for that credibility directing them to read the most interesting book ever written, why would you waste a moment?

 

The time it took you to compose your response could have been cut very short by simply letting me know that you have just read the Prologue and are blown away.

 

It is most interesting how everyone goes about retreating from this book which I am not suggesting has nothing to do with a Higher Energy Reaction HER at work.

 

It is though extraordinary how everyone inevitably ends up in the same leaky boat, singing the same boring tune.

 

How well do you know blogger and radio show host Joshua Holland?

 

Most people have to sit on the toilet at least once day even if wearing adult diapers, a perfect time to start the book while making mental notes of all your questions.

 

The D I book of course undermines all previous discourses including university text books on the subjects of economics, law, political science and finance making a joke of all the bought and paid for politicians other than the few naive and too full of themselves to enquirer more.

 

You don’t get invited to sit for the critical thinking entrance exam before joining the extraordinarily well greased money-mineral resources mafia monopoly by first demonstrating you are the class clown.

 

Bear in mind that it is going on 42 years ago that I began qualifying with “flying colors” and knowing I was on the right track from the very start once impressing upon Harry Oppenheimer that I knew the right questions to ask.

 

It is also worth noting that I am 100% certain that Elon Musk would not argue with my contention that it is impossible for anyone to improve upon the question “How many coincidences does it take before it is no longer a coincidence?” where the answer is the given number 42; 42 described as “The answer to Life, The Universe and Everything” in the fiction book, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy and which of course Musk thinks most highly of as well as its author Douglas Adam who died at age 49, the same age as Musk.

 

The fact that I figured out the question along with the answer 42 long before hearing Musk talk about it in an interview back on September 29, is not inconsequential.

 

Nor is it immaterial that Musk is closely connected to people closely connected to Jeffrey Epstein and nor does that make Elon Musk a pedophile.

 

He has starting December 1st, the 46th anniversary of the passing of Mossad head David Ben Gurion who I got to know intimately during my 4 month Ulpan-Gadna training at his kibbutz Sde Boker the year before, a defamation jury trial where his accuser, a diver managed to get under Musk’s skin resulting in a war of words all stemming from both parties trying to do the right thing and save the lives of trapped kids.

 

Btw my parting words to Ben Gurion as I prepared my departure back to mineral rich South Africa where Musk was not quite 18 months old, “Those who know don’t talk; those who don’t, do all the talking; once you tell a secret it is no longer a secret”. They were in response to Ben Gurion’s question, “What have you learned?”

 

A 15 year old if allowed to fly free and high

from an early age and that takes very special parents who see travel as the most important study of the mostly monotonous human who fails to see the perfection of nature which is never uninteresting because nature is the exact opposite of monotonous, is capable of thinking outside the box.

 

Someone has an interest in wanting to see Musk at a minimum get sick and lose his vitality.

 

How his lawyers and other advisors have failed to resolve these rather minor matters outside of a courtroom may in fact be nothing more than an Act of God

 

I see it however as an opportunity for Musk to shine at the same time take a tighter grip on those within his inner circle who are serving another master which of course might be nothing more than their out of control ego, and that too is dangerous.

 

Then again it is not cautious to be naive once you have got your head around the business of pro non competition De Beers-Barclays-Deutche Bank-House of Saud-Lloyd’s of London.

 

The British love their aristocracy even though they know their place but they compensate by the feeling that the royals make them feel special.

 

Otherwise they would have long got rid of their royals, pomp and ceremony.

 

Once the very uninteresting and rather unaccomplished British royals depart to oblivion the rest will soon follow, and the Dutch royals no better.

 

They are very tight and the Lords of the money count on this tightness amongst them, but they, Emperors Without Clothes, are unraveling very fast.

 

But nor are they smart, inbreeding does that, and that you see with the arrogance of pedophile Prince Andrew.

 

The veneer is very thin this support of the British royal family whose next in line thought nothing of wearing a Nazi Swastika armband to match the Nazi Gestapo uniform and his elder brother William next in line after his father Charles to be king, thought nothing when alongside Harry choosing such a disgusting outfit.

 

Malicious I would say!

 

They were not 3 year olds at the time.

 

You have now the aristocracy of GB and the plebes all joining forces and twisting the tables, making how Jeffrey Epstein got his money the central theme.

 

That unraveling began today at 8:40:24 AM Calif time today, just over 4 hours ago.

 

History is in the making.

 

You may also be pondering the prospects of getting your next book out post haste, and that would not only be deceitful but foolhardy given the huge footprint I have on the internet despite everyone so cowardly non committal.

 

Note that I have removed the name and email address of this highly educated British aristocrat economist who I know extraordinarily well and who jumped at the opportunity to deflect, and in the process help reveal that much more the Achilles Heel of the British establishment which has been going downhill ever since they threw out Winston Churchill, just 2 months after Nazi Germany surrendered.

 

Nor would it surprise me if you were unaware of such a disgrace bearing in mind when the puppeteers of the British Crown brought back Winston years later it was only to mock him more, and strengthen their grip on the Royals who add nothing to the economy of the United Kingdom.

 

By now you should have realized that once the pivotal economic index GDP is systematically flawed any conversation surrounding such debauchery is spoken by complete idiots or stooges; again all well articulated in The D I book.

 

Btw, did you see my advice to send me a facebook friend invitation so that I could add you to my several group chats where you have the opportunity to ask the likes of Alan Dershowitz and Peter Thiel their take on The D I book or anything else you choose?

 

Wouldn’t you do the same with the power to play God and knowing that the people if given the knowledge-truth would rally around you rather than admit to being horribly fooled?

 

Once you have the truth, you know everyone’s game! ~ Marie Dion Gevisser

 

Gary

 

From: Gary2 <gary@2facetruth.com>

Date: November 21, 2019 at 8:40:24 AM PST
To: British aristocratic
Subject: Re:  … hi – why do you think the Brits seem so sketchy about PrinceAndrew?

Yes Epstein’s wealth accumulation is the most sketchy from the standpoint of wealth accumulation but it seems the people don’t want to dig deep into that because it quickly moves into the inheritance monies which don’t seem to stop pedophiles not even within the Royals

Wouldn’t it be great if the truth that is getting out brings down all the royals and levels the playing field?

I believe I began to cover that rather well in my last missive Bow lower

I will send you a copy

So why are the British so defensive and not wanting to comment on this scoundrel prince who they put up on a pedestal ?

Imagine if a cook so disgusted bumps him off, wouldn’t the people believe he was done in by the family?

It is doubtful he will ever be seen again in public for fear of being served a subpoena?

Wouldn’t  that be justice enough for his victims as well as his sick supporters?

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 21, 2019, at 8:13 AM, British aristocrat friend

wrote:

Hi Gary – not sure what you mean by ‘sketchy’ – he has now withdrawn from all public events. How did your fellow American Mr Epstein, who we are told was a maths teacher, become a multi- millionaire ??

(First name of Aristocrat friend)

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: gary@2facetruth.com
Sent: 20 November 2019 02:03
To: British aristocratic 
Subject: (First name if aristocrat friend) hi – why do you think the Brits seem so sketchy about PrinceAndrew?

I’m located in Denver.

I just read your other emails. So much to unpack, and I’m always interested in learning more about these “tentacles”, especially when they have ties to guys like Oppenheimer. I must confess that I don’t know enough about that family, but I’m interested to learn more. I’m currently in the middle of moving from one side of town to another, but once things calm down on my end I’m going to get more into this topic. It seems like there are some mysteries that are worth investigating, even if they don’t get much attention, like this one.

Charlie

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 6:20 PM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

Charlies – I just forwarded you from my gary@2facetruth.com email my earlier broadcast titled, “Bow much lower”.

Where are you located?

Gary

On Nov 20, 2019, at 5:04 PM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

Charlie, I only saw this message from you now which is after I just sent out a heavily broadcasted email where I reference you, but only in a positive way and simply making note that I had yet to hear from you.

I will forward that to you immediately after I hit the send button.

The man on the right is Nicholas Oppenheimer, the only son of the Octopus of Octopus’ Harry Oppenheimer

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/03/19/magazine/harry-oppenheimer-s-empire-going-for-the-gold.html

I am also quite certain that you hadn’t read the feature story in the New York Times of March 19, 1989, Harry Oppenheimer’s Empire: Going for the Gold otherwise you might have used a different title or your book would have centered about this German-South African Oppenheimer family.

Harry Oppenheimer also directly supervised my year long orientation into this very dark DAAC [De Beers-Anglo American Corporation] enterprise which once you understand their workings which is spelled out clearly in Professor Edward Jay Epstein’s epic 1978 non-fiction book, The Diamond Invention so you know that you have got caught up in their false propaganda of this “Club of 300” deciding the fate of the world.

It takes very strong intestinal fortitude to deal with such important truths especially if you have given speeches or written books which have the Oppenheimer family and their charitable trusts such as Brenthurst Foundation where you find key military intelligence officers including a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, laughing themselves silly.

I not only tell it the way it but it is in your interest and everyone’s interest that I do so.

The fact that you have had your finger as close as I have seen to being “on the pulse” deserves commendation; the same however cannot be said of everyone investigating this very important Jeffrey Epstein which is much bigger than the Trump impeachment even if it results in a Democratic being appointed interim president.

The Presidents of the United States have not mattered one iota ever since president Eisenhower ordered the assassination of Patrice Lumumba who met his torture death on the same day that Eisenhower gave his infamous Industrial Military Complex nonsense speech.

The fact that you bring up the Red Cross is just too funny because as sick as it is and it happens to be true, it is unlikely you know of their pivotal role in the arming of Nazi Germany which you learn about in chapter 9 of The D I book aptly titled, DIAMONDS FOR HITLER.

My suggestion is that you send me a facebook friend invitation and then it makes it easier to invite you to some of my group chats where you “see in the flesh” the likes of Alan Dershowitz.

Your naming of Peter Thiel who you must realize looks a lot like elderly Roy Cohn

<UNADJUSTEDNONRAW_thumb_69c2.jpeg>

gets you up close to the DAAC-Oppenheimers who have cast a wide web during their less than 119 odd rule, but still they are no match against the forces of good-nature.

Gary

On Nov 19, 2019, at 12:21 PM, TheOctopusofglobalcontrol <TheOctopusofglobalcontrol@protonmail.com> wrote:

Gary,

No, who is the man on the right? Please tell me more.

Charlie

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Monday, November 18, 2019 8:38 PM, Gary Gevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

There is a connecting dark as in DAAC (De beers-Anglo American Corporation)

Would you have recognized the man on the right without direction?

Let me know if you want to hear more

All the best,

Gary

Sent from my iPhone