Pages Navigation Menu
Categories Navigation Menu

What is a just price – Less sensitivity results in greater intelligence – Re: Im interested in anti-Trust law

Posted by | Comments Off on What is a just price – Less sensitivity results in greater intelligence – Re: Im interested in anti-Trust law

From: “De Repetitor” <repetitor@ziggo.nl>
Subject: What is a just price? – Less sensitivity results in greater intelligence – Re: Im interested in anti-Trust law
Date: June 22, 2018 at 6:15:51 AM PDT
To: “GaryStevenGevisser” <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>

I overlooked the cc part. That can happen. As most mails do not contain cc.
The most important problem at the moment in my view is your mothers situation.
If she is not suffering Alsheimer than what is happening is terrible.
If indeed trough price fixing etc some people are being screwed and other profit unjustafiably,
then the next question is: how will this wrong be fixed.
Apart from simanteling the pricefixing system etc, how much are you now going to pay for what is mined up in Africa.
What is a just price? And do you have to compensate for the years of theft? And how much?
Rather impossible questions.
Should you take away the Smut’’s family farm, given that is still exists, and give it to a black family who were there 300 years ago.
Because the Smut’s family farm land was probably not gotten in a way we would discribe as legal  or fair (which is not the same thing of course, but they are both important)
Can such a problem ever be solved to satisfaction of all involved?
While you mothers predicament could possible be solved in a way which is best for  your mother and the people
who love her. That is, if she is not suffering dementia. I mean she could have good weeks of bad weeks etc.
Ofcourse the whole thing looks very suspicious as first diagnosed with severe dementia and then with mild dementia.
And in the video’s she does seem to know what she is talking about.
And the mail your sister sent about food, and food for the dogs etc.
If you are sitting on 50 million, how can you ever worry about that you mother has just enough to eat?
That is completly insane,
I hesitated in answering because I find it such a painfull situation, and if it is true what you are saying,
that she is not suffering from dementia, a truly horrible predicament.
(and if she is suffering from dementia it is also horrible for her and for the ones who love her)
What can I say about it?
If she is of sound mind you can only fight them in a court of law. With the help of doctor’s attesting that she is ok.
I would not presume that all doctors are corrupt and all judges are too.
That there is a possibility to fight this.
I would think your mother would be happiest in England where she has lived most of the past 30 years as I understand it.
And where she has caring neighbours. Friends. (although at her age these start disappearing at an alarming rate)
I remember in the 80’s, my grandmother in her 80’s, living in her flat. And in ten years time she lost most of her friends and acquaintances, and
her older sister, to whom she was very close and who lived like 10 minutes away. (and who died of an heart attack, in the weeks preceding her moving out of her appartment and
having to go to an old peoples home, that just killed her, and her family were not even mailcious, they thought they were handling her interest)
Anyway the whole growing old business is very sad. And you get taken less serious etc. In general it is pretty horrible.
I will go into the other DIG thing as soon as I part of the book you poited out to me 2 days ago.
Peter – How could you possibly think that your answer to my very specific question to an American university addresses that question?

 
The question was “Who should I speak to?”
 
Had I included you in the carbon copy section then maybe it would make sense that you would simply write back to me, “Do you want to hear what I have to say about European Union anti-Trust law?”
 
Considering all the questions you have yet to answer which I have sent you directly and you end up acknowledging that anti-Trust law is not your specialty which you know I know because you don’t know as much as me about De Beers-Barclays who oversee all the world’s anti-trust laws which they have never abided by, it tells me that you are looking to distract yourself at the same time delay responding to me on most important matters.
 
In fact, this is the second time you have responded to something that is not close to the importance of my previous responses to your writings.
 
I find that very strange.
 
The first time of course was when you wrote this equally detailed stuff about my mother and you end with, “But I think you will scare people away if you speak of murder.”
 
You make out like murder is not as common place as it is.
 
Moreover, I respond in great detail to your assertions and instead of replying by answering my question which was right at the beginning, “What would be a better expression to describe what is happening to my mother at the hands of my siblings so as not to scare people away and support me in my quest?” you come back with what is not only totally off subject to what we have been talking about, other than you keep avoiding discussion of Epstein’s The D I book which is all about the total nonsense of the world’s anti-Trust, anti-money laundering, ant-terrorist laws etc etc, but what you have written about anti-Trust law is what you would expect from someone trying to distract.
 
The most important of course is my question to you of what you think is the best way to bring out the best in your brother given how all those who profit from war, and who would far prefer to quieten both me and my mother Zena who was the first civilian allowed into the captured territories of the Sinai following the 1967 Israel-Arab war, NOT because her name was pulled out of hat.

 
I have also gone on to explain the diplomatic communities role in being the furtherest removed from ensuing peace or ending local and national corruption until such time as the easily manageable elite are in power.
 
Should I follow up with your brother ahead of you giving me your opinion on how to bring out the best in him, you must accept that I will consider it too little and too late, and therefore to critique what I finally send Geoffrey will be tantamount to water over a duck’s back.
 
Imagine right now the entire literate population in an Internet chat room and reading this in real time, you would expect that to get them there they would first of all be interested in what is being discussed and that would mean they would first of all know about me.
 
You should recall me suggesting to German Rainier that the one way to show that he really wishes Marie and me well is to hit “reply all” which he failed to do. My guess is that he hopes I will get distracted with other events and never return to hold his feet to the fire.
 
I will not only be responding to Rainer’s lameness in due course but to American Charles Ivie’s decision yesterday to hit “reply all” to my broadcast “Please note… My name is Gary Gevisser”.
 
The fact that besides for President Putin putting out that photo of himself and Oppenheimer, I am the only other person talking about it, does not mean that I am either mad or exaggerating its importance.
 
BTW, don’t you just love my mother’s Zena’s display of her great sense of humor in this filming – CLICK HERE.
 
When people try to distract me, it does not have me thinking it is wise that I should fall for their trap.

 
The reason I blind copied you on the email below to Purdue University was first of all to help you more easily locate Purdue University which you access from the hyperlink at the bottom of chapter 18,THE AMERICAN CONSPIRACY of Epstein’s The D I book which you have yet to comment on. 
 
Previously, I have mentioned to you at least twice the importance that scholarly Edward J. Epstein attached to the important role that well-known universities such as Kaplan-Purdue play in steering in particular students of law either off course and/or choose the path of corruption.
 
Prior to Purdue purchasing recently Kaplan University for $1 from its former owner, inheritor Donald E. Graham who used to own the Washington Post, the hyperlink at the bottom of chapter took you to Kaplan University.
 
Graham and Facebook founder, Zuckerberg are as close as it gets. 
 
Do you think Graham was unaware that his very valuable Kaplan University were the only official advertiser on the most important non-fiction book ever written?
 
How do you think Graham and Zuckerberg would do in a debate with me starting with whether either of them have read The D I book?
 
You once mentioned that it was of interest to your brother Geoffrey what one particular journalist had to say about “conspiracy theories” and so of course, it should be important to you what your brother thinks of the Diamond Invention Game [DIG] which Epstein explains extraordinarily well in his 1978, page-turner book, The Diamond Invention.
 
It is certainly important to me what your brother thinks of it because he is in a position to help all those who have no voice given his elevated status as the Dutch Ambassador to a most important war-zone, and I have previously explained the role that bankers play in war, beginning with World War II financier, German-Dutch banker Fritz Mannheimer whose widow went on to marry South African Invader, German-American Charles W. Engelhard Jr. [1917-1971] who wasted little time after first journeying to mineral rich South Africa in the late 1940s, the same time as my maternal family left England for South Africa, to reach into our family trading business and sending off the French Rothschild family with their tails between their legs.
 
By now you must know that Engelhard Jr. is the central character of chapter 18, THE AMERICAN CONSPIRACY of The D I book.
 
So you understand that you are not the first person to tell me that you just haven’t had the time to start reading the most important non-fiction book ever written.
 
It also doesn’t take people long to say, “You have been sending me so many emails that I just don’t know where to begin”, and then they all go very quiet.
 
I am hoping, because it makes logical sense, that others will learn from the mistakes of the past.
 
I could be right now writing to very important Elon Musk at the same time posting up my writings on his and his mother Maye’s Facebook walls, but I consider this more important.
 
What is obvious to me may not be obvious to everyone but that does not mean I should dwell on everything that is not obvious to others, and put aside what I consider important.
 
Everyone should only do what they think makes sense to them.
 
Most if not all the problems of the world could easily be solved were us humans guided to be problem solvers rather than problem creators and talkers about nothing.
 
I also blind copied you on my response earlier to Rothwell. That too doesn’t require a response.
 
Since Rothwell is telling us that he is focused on nothing other than to distract at this point, to include him in the cc section, should serve his purpose and whatever response we get out of him, to pay little to no attention unless it is something worth mentioning and teaching the next generation of humans.
 
I take you at your word that you are genuinely motivated to assist me spread my knowledge and at the same time stay alive, and therefore eager to let Rothwell and others pulling out all stops to make the world as chaotic as possible, that they are bad people.
 
Do you think that Rothwell was naive when deciding to join the OECD back in 2013?
 
Can you tell me anything good that the Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development which houses the Nuclear Energy Agency has done since its inception back in 1961?
 
Do you think that just because you may have never previously given thought to the highly illogical and morally indefensible GDP index that somehow makes it virtuous?
 
Do you think that the consumerism it has spread throughout the globe has made us humans more sensitive?
 
Could you see us humans less sensitive than say Mango?
 
Do you think less sensitivity results in greater intelligence?
 
In the 24 years that I was silent after leaving De Beers-Barclays once they had wiped out all their resistors in Israel, it did not mean I was incapable of predicting all human behavior once they learned the true nature of octopus De Beers-Barclays which they revealed so clearly not only in Epstein’s 1978, non-fiction book but that one of a kind article I pointed you to previously, at least once, in the New York York times, also aptly titled, “Harry Oppenheimer’s Empire: Going for the Gold”.
 
When everyone wants to join the bully, you have something very remarkable taking place.
 
That article came out on March 19, 1989. All De Beers-Barclays success previous, including escaping prosecution at Nuremberg did not mean De Beers-Barclays failed to celebrate when the academic community failed to react to the mind-boggling article.
 
Yesterday while watching the World Cup soccer game between France and Peru here in Piana, Corse I ran into a Professor of History from Boston College whose law school, Mr. Krinsk Esquire attended.
 
He and I didn’t exchange names or email addresses. He was accompanied by a woman who was also very into  soccer. We had a great time. He knew more about the Dutch involvement in southern African affairs during the 17th century than most, and you would expect that since that is how he makes a living, but of course he was clueless about what happened after De Beers founder Cecil Rhodes died because the history books don’t quite spell it out.
 
A professor of history like a professor of economics only know what the text books tell them otherwise they wouldn’t be lecturing at university.
 
I don’t need to remind you how all the professors of your alma mater, Leiden University all went quiet once I introduced myself.
 
All anti-Trust laws fall apart when you have one wildly successful banking-mining monopolist such as De Beers-Barclays. The D I book explains this real world graphically. 
 
Common sense also tells you that. 
 
That is the hardest thing to swallow because all humans including arse kissers think they have common sense.
 
Can you imagine someone like Rothwell getting up before his university class at Stanford University and saying, 
 
Let me begin by telling you that I have now read Epstein’s The Diamond Invention book, and what I find most disturbing is that it tells me that despite all my schooling I lack common sense. 
 
Given how I feel for all of you, and I really care about future humanity, I feel the need to be the first to tell it exactly the way it is. 
 
But in fact I cannot lay claim to being the first because this white Jewish South African Gary S. Gevisser not only beat me to it, but it was like pulling out both sets of my teeth before I would even acknowledge reading The D I book which I have yet to do and at the same time acknowledge that I have been teaching for the past 27 years here at Stanford University total garbage which has paid the bills, and because I am such a good arse kisser, the OECD-NEA can’t wait for me to join them.
 
Lawyers, judges, lawmakers, real estate speculators, medical doctors and the such all fall apart when they read The D I book, and they also don’t stop talking.
 
My human behavior study did not end with my 3 elder siblings because it began with them. Their reaction to The D I book is what they have done to my mother Zena.
 
So of course you would expect all those who have fallen victim to lack of common sense to want to go lightly on my 3 elder siblings and their co-conspirators, and also lecture me on a better way for me to save my mother’s life.
 
Do you think when people who profit from war get together and discuss all the crazy war conspiracies out there they see themselves as above it all?

 
You didn’t need to read The D I book in its entirety to know the gun-money-power of De Beers-Barclays. You just needed to understand that De Beers’ favorite clients are the bankers and I provided you with that text right out of chapter 16, WARRING WITH ISRAEL. You show those words to any student of law, they have to ask themselves, “Why bother?”
 
I think you would agree that the title of my short response to Rothwell, “Why bother?” was most appropriate.
 
When you heard that my mother’s paternal grandmother Nechie Becker Bardash [1874-1943] witnessed the murder of her entire immediate family back in 1888 in the tiny village of Plonsk, White Russia-Poland where Ben Gurion had been born 2 years before, you surely didn’t think that was the end of either all conspiracies or the conspiracy to wipe the world clean of Jewish people, and replace them with Jewish Kapos.
 
When you have quietened all the Jewish people throughout the world, you have committed a most heinous crime which is best understood by the lack of outrage of what is being done to my mother.
 
If you don’t have courage, what does it mean to you to be a human being?
 
So of course there are people including most of my 408 Facebook friends who want to remain somewhat in contact with me.
 
Remember Musk’s calculation; one in billions that this is NOT a simulation.
 
That does not prove that God exists.
 
What matters is what each of us does with the cards we are dealt.
 
The indifferent may or may not return as cows but nor can they expect to be rewarded at the end of the game should a Higher Energy Force [HER] exist.
 
Wouldn’t you prefer to communicate with a HER than all those who ignore the truth about the manipulation of the money?
 
The Money Talks explains rather well what is being done to my mother in Israel and all that the people do is either distract or ignore.
 
Why would you want to have anything to do with such boring people?
 
You haven’t come back to me with how you would go about describing what is being done to my mother Zena given her explicit and clear wishes. Marie thought that I should have kept my response to you short and ending when I began with that question, but I wanted to give you more of the history, in the event you didn’t already know it.
 
There is more that my sister and brothers did once they turned and began to vulture my mother’s second husband, Alan Zulman.
 
Here is one more piece and it is explained rather well by Deborah Sturman Esq who you can read more about in a feature story of the Wall Street Journal – CLICK HERE – titled, Milberg Weiss Lawyer Focuses On Cases for Holocaust Survivors.
 
That story of May 19, 1999 broke just 23 days before “momworker63’s” response on the Revlon Yahoo message board which was triggered by my inquiry the day before wanting to learn more from “insiders” about Revlon’s Cosmetic Center. 
 
As I have previously mentioned, that cry for help could easily have been the 63rd Attorney General of New York York State, Eliot Spitzer Esq., a close intimate of Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. who I was counting on to prosecute the civil, shareholder class action lawsuit against Revlon and its majority shareholder Ronald O. Perelman assuming we were able to come up with concrete evidence of wrongdoing beyond the mathematical probability theory that I had first produced when studying the financial statements of Revlon.
 
BTW, I only agreed with Krinsk not to continue the prosecution of the case against Perelman and accept Perelman’s $10 million settlement offer because Krinsk assured me that his friend Spitzer was now going to press criminal charges against Perelman, which of course did not happen. That is because Spitzer had other agendas which was not pursuing call girls who were simply the result of his bad conscience.
 
Back to my siblings and the Israeli lawyers, judges and lawmakers keeping my mother Zena captive in Israel. I think you would agree that when you go against the expressed wishes of a most lucid 87 year old woman there is something gravely wrong going on, and if one has a conscience it should be seriously investigated.
 
On August 14, 2016, Deborah Sturman Esq. who hadn’t forgotten my pivotal role in the prosecution of Perelman-Revlon and was only helping me to assist my mother Zena because she had a bad conscience and a bad conscience also causes people to forget their past coverup attempts to hide their wrongs, wrote me this communication below:  [I have removed the irrelevant material so as to keep you focused on your concern that I was going overboard in calling the treatment of my mother Zena “murder” and that it would hurt my credibility.]
 


From: “Sturman, Deborah_NY” <sturman@sturman.ch>
Subject: RE: your ‘phone message
Date: August 14, 2016 at 11:01:36 PM GMT+2
To: ‘GaryStevenGevisser’ <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>

I am on Eli Symon’s non-responsiveness and have a plan.  I will see about finding you a lawyer in Israel. Shmuel [Deborah Sturman’s nephew] can be hired rather inexpensively to look into the social structures. He is being my man on the ground and since he is a lawyer, but just graduated law school (and it was a religious law school) I am going to get a civil lawyer too and have Shmuel assist and support.

Kathy is trying to sweet talk Lance. She has offered to invite him to Australia and denies that she said they wanted to sell his apartment, something Ros and Jonny heard.

 

 

That Lance is Lance Zulman who is Alan Zulman’s only son. Lance suffers from autism. In other words his mental faculties are not as sharp as someone trying to manipulate him.

 
Driving an autism victim out of their home and you are sitting on a $50+ million payday, is a little extreme, wouldn’t you say?
 
Believing that Alan Zulman had no fight left in him as my sister and two elder brothers “climbed in”, my sister Kathy told Alan Zulman that upon his death she was going to sell Lance Zulman’s only home which is a small apartment in Israel that he has lived in a lifetime. 
 
Nor did it bother my sister that there were witnesses. Money talks in this conscienceless society.
 
My Wicked Witch of the East sister Kathy thought that she would stick it to Alan Zulman the way that a cowardly matador sticks his knives into the defenseless bull.
 
Sturman’s writings are very clear that there were witnesses to my sister’s vulgarity including Ros Norris, Alan Zulman’s only sibling  and Ros’ lifetime husband Jonny Norris.
 
Let me now go back to an email Ms. Sturman Esq. who also knows about The D I book, sent me 3 days earlier:
 

From: “Sturman, Deborah_NY” <sturman@sturman.ch>
Subject: RE: Normal – Simon 
Date: August 11, 2016 at 5:40:06 PM GMT+2
To: ‘GaryStevenGevisser’ <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>

Hi Gary,

I sent an email to Eli Symon simply asking if he had time to discuss Alan’s will. I sent it this morning and have not heard back.

Let me say a bit about the rest of what you wrote. You misunderstand Alan’s penultimate will. He did not grant Kathy any authority over him. It was written for the event he died before your mother.  That is, we hope, water under the bridge.

I advise you strongly to not raise any of the rest of your message again. You will hurt yourself by arguing that your mother is adequately lucid to have any say in any of this. First, no one will believe it and second, you will hurt your credibility. She has severe dementia, thank God in the most lovely way I have ever seen in that she appears happy and satisfied. She does not remember half of her children most of the time, does not know what happened to Alan or what her relationships are and very much of her earlier life.  Moreover, she has seen more of Neil than of any of you and he treats her with great love and kindness. If you invoke lucidity there is an excellent chance that she says she wants Neil to care for her.  Lucidity is simply not a plausible argument or one likely to serve your purpose.

Guardianships are normally determined by the best interest of the person requiring a guardian. That’s it. So if the decision is made that she would be best off in Wivy, chances are that Neil would get guardianship barring any grave malfeasance or danger of malfeasance. I just don’t see that to be possible.  Emphasis on the word “grave.”  None of what you say comes close to malfeasance. If she is to remain in Israel a decision would have to be made who the guardian should be, someone local, perhaps Eli Symon, or someone else.

The financial aspects are determined by her property and hopefully Alan’s will.

I see no point in going on about you and your siblings’ relationships to your mother or anything that has happened in the past, nor do I see any point in trying to elicit a meaningful opinion from your mother.

This is a straightforward legal determination. You can situate yourself as one of the decision makers if you stick strictly to the legally relevant points. It makes no sense to get into a “fistfight” with your siblings about who she loves more and who is horrible. It will hurt your credibility.

Legally this is about one thing and one thing only, your mother’s well-being.

I really see no need to engage with any more of the interpersonal relationships between you and your siblings. I am very angry and disappointed in the three of them given how they acted towards Alan as he was dying. There is nothing more that is of any relevance to me.

Deborah

 
Peter try focusing your mind exclusively on what Ms. Sturman Esquire wrote, “You will hurt yourself by arguing that your mother is adequately lucid to have any say in any of this… nor do I see any point in trying to elicit a meaningful opinion from your mother.”
 
To top it off, Sturman who is “tied at hip” with Harvard Law School professor Arthur Miller, then has her neophyte nephew lawyer, Shmuel Rabi writes me a month after they have Israeli police remove me from my mother’s apartment at 1:30am, Tuesday, September 27, 2016, a no less disgusting email calling upon me to get my sister Kathy and her Israeli lawyer friend Ayala Weisel to find the money to prevent my mother from being in darkness:
 

https://www.2facetruth.com/your-mother-zena-zulman/

 
Yes, my sister Kathy and Sturman Esq. hate each other, but that doesn’t prevent them from showing how ugly the human can get when it hates most of all the feeling of being stupid about the money and they are all about the money.
 
How do all the people forget so quickly that there can be no joy when you no longer have truth-logic at your side and the information continues to get out there.
 
So I may not finish my book, but at least it is not only the 3 of you who know exactly where you stand with me.
 
Please feel free to write to Sturman asking her what she has been doing since to improve my mother’s “well-being”?
 
Remember Ms. Sturman was not in diapers, at least not baby diapers when she wrote those words, and then so  cowardly manipulates her nephew in an effort to distract.
 
Yes, you should study the similarities of Deborah Sturman and my sister Kathy beginning by how my sister begins to deflect all her wrongdoing on to Deborah Sturman Esq.
 

https://www.2facetruth.com/bring-money-no-memory-hide-dementia-dementia-dementia-dementia-complete-dementia/

 
Ms. Sturman Esq. is a key cog in the wheel that has all you Europeans believing that final justice came to Holocaust survivors when she got German banks to fork over a bunch of billions which had them celebrating given how they produced those monies out of thin air and it only costing the poor who continue to be squeezed.
 
Zero cost of capital to an Empire Builder of Elites cannot be the thinking small minded people. Small minded people would catch on to this immediately, wouldn’t you think?
 
The world is mean but that still doesnt damper my spirits that there is beauty behind the human ugliness.
 
It shouldn’t be hard for you to imagine how much celebration there would be out there were I to die either accidentally or an intentional killing. 
 
I ended my writings to you two days ago, “Wouldn’t you want your mother dead, if you were in my siblings’ shoes? How would you go about doing it?”
 
Would you if you were in my shoes just sit around and wait for death’s door to open before pulling out stops at least in the hope that God exists?
 
I don’t know of anyone who thinks clearer than me and it is crystal clear that this Higher Energy Source exists, so why wait for the maddening crowd to applaud when the evidence is overwhelming that they are programmed to just serve themselves for their own existence, quite different to any other species.
 
Those who have previously communicated with me would have something to talk about once I am gone, and that would be it.
 
You can’t expect people who have no conscience to suddenly develop one even if they tell themselves and others that they are good and that they do have a conscience.
 
It is possible that you haven’t finished reading because you may not have begun, the 4 letters/articles of my published in the JP beginning right after the Rich pardon and the one which talks about how mass murder begins with the first killing.
 
Over the course of the past 6 years when Marie, Mango and I have spent on average just less than half the year traveling the world, I have communicated with going on 700 Airbnb Hosts and have stayed at over 60 Airbnb dwellings. We have also stayed at about the same number of dwellings including hotels by other providers such as Book King [sic].
 
Prior to this journey which has been as much about an epic study of human behavior as it has been to seeing the devastation of the environment due to human overpopulation caused by the manipulation of the money which makes any conversation about money limits a joke, I already knew a great many people.
 
This study in fact began in ernest with my first public composition back on October 18, 2000, a present to my dad on his 77th birthday, and which if you haven’t already read, you can access via The Internet.
 
I could pick up the phone to any ceo of any corporation and get through instantly. Nor did I need to present my De Beers-Barclays credentials which I never did. 
 
A great many of those 700 Airbnb hosts know as much as you about me.
 
All the chief executive officers I have dealt with over the years including Ronald O. Perelman, and Maurice Hank Greenberg former CEO of AIG haven’t forgotten me unless they are suffering from dementia.
 
BTW, last evening we ran into another Parkinson’s Disease individual; a going on 62 year old Australian man, married to an Australian GP medical doctor, and he has been living with it for the past 8 years and now wears under his chest skin connected to his brain a Deep Brain Stimulator [DBS] which is helping him tremendously.
 
This Parkinson’s Disease is an epidemic, and if you think that is an over-exaggeration then you are entitled to your opinion.
 
There is nothing in the least bit humble about being arrogant.
 
There are virtues in being humble and you would expect me to see the rewards. 
 
Being humble first of all does not mean one is stupid, quite the opposite in fact.
 
One cannot lay claim to being humble when one avoids the important truths beginning with the fact that the only reason there are poor in this world is because of the manipulation of the money and resources.
 
Any discussion to avoid talking about those irrefutable facts is arrogant.
 
The world is made up of liars and hypocrites and that becomes totally transparent when seeing the world’s reaction to the DIG.
 
I am obviously blessed not only in having two most remarkable, most humble parents but my wife Marie Dion is also no dummy. Then there is Mango and the funniest part is how whenever someone hears that he is vegetarian and their eyes tell them that they have never seen a going on 9 year old dog as healthy and full of energy as Mango, the discussion about his diet ends.
 
I cannot say the chairman of the board of Hearst Corporation, Randolph Apperson Hearst [1915-2000] has forgotten me because he is dead and what he is doing today or thinking is something only he and God and all the others who know more would be able to talk to.
 
Hearst, who I may not have already mentioned to you, did not assume much about me other than that I was the  youngest brother of my eldest brother Neil who introduced me to Hearst and his wife Veronica back in 1993 which was a couple of years after I celebrated with senior National Security Council member, Roger W. Robinson – CLICK HERE – his 40th birthday which ended with “Our Man Roger”, his bosom buddy, my one American attorney of umpteen years, King Golden Jr. who introduced me to Marie, and I enjoying dessert at Spago’s restaurant in west Hollywood.
 
The following evening Roger who joined the NSC in March 1982 – CLICK HERE – the same year that Epstein’s The D I book was first published by my future clients, Simon & Schuster, celebrated with President Ronald W. Reagan, Reagan’s 80th birthday. It so happens that “Our Man Roger” and President RWR not only share the same birthday, February 6, just 40 years apart, but the same initials which went down really well with Nancy Reagan who was very much into astrology and the such.
 
In October 2002, the same month and year that Jeffrey R. Krinsk Esq. conducted a 9+ hour deposition of a Revlon senior official, “Our Man Roger” became the inaugural chairman of the all important China-US Security Review Commission who during “closed door sessions” with their counterparts “lay down the law”, in other words military law which is the exact opposite of democratic principles, at least not until the empire building is complete and the troublemakers either murdered or quietened, and eventually this empire building can claim majority rule, free speech and the such. 
 
BTW, this Revlon senior official who referred to Perelman during this epic deposition as “Capo di Capi” – CLICK HERE – didn’t take long to fall apart thanks to all our “due diligence” which included Mr. Krinsk receiving a 2001 Christmas present, a manilla envelope containing a 2 page letter which was taken off the desk of Revlon’s General Counsel, W. H. Nichols – CLICK HERE – who received it on November 30, 1998. Moreover, this anonymous mailing to Krinsk playing a great role in “nailing the coffin” of Perelman-Revlon even though Revlon later shared with us during the discovery process this most incriminating letter between the figureheads of Revlon and CVS which is not an exactly small dispensary of drugs.
 
Most level headed Randolph Apperson Hearst had me jump through a series of hoops before he asked me to replace his current and long time ceo and to also publish this book I am writing in real time. He was also willing to match the $6 million “sign on bonus” that my father’s first cousin, David Gevisser was paid when agreeing to be an executor of Engelhard Jr.’s estate.
 
My decision to turn down both offers was not taken lightly but I knew then they were the right decisions and the reaction of people since confirms that.
 
Roger W. Robinson was very aware that I was dealing directly with Hearst because King Golden Jr. kept “Our Man Roger” aware of everything that I was doing at this most critical period of “wealth building”.
 
Today “Our Man Roger” as well as King Golden Jr. are “laying low”  but that doesn’t mean they have forgotten me.
 
Yes, I have very powerful enemies and they would all be the first to say that if there is this Higher Energy Source [HER] they already have to be suffering horribly.
 
A great many people who are far less of a threat to the status quo than I am, have been bumped off, and this fact of life is not lost on my mother Zena.
 
There are very few good people.
 
You can also see from all the film footage of my mother that she is a very good person.
 
That has not, however, got any of the bad people to move in a positive direction.
 
I don’t count on the bad to do good, because that would make me stupid.  CLICK HERE.
 
I am hoping that you will not only get back to me with what you thought was important, namely finding the best way to describe what is being done to my mother Zena but to stick to what you know which is clearly not as much as me when it comes to anti-Trust laws and the distribution of the monies by organizations like the European Commission.
 
BTW, when Marie, Mango and I were in Portugal
we ran into at a boutique hotel a Spanish banking regulator, Rafa Zulueta – rafazulueta@gmail.com. Rafa who lives in Madrid when not traveling the world, was on vacation with his wife and 3 children who like their parents speak a perfect English. All 5 of them probably know the United States better than the overwhelming majority of  Americans.
 
It was only the 8 of us breakfast and of course Marie and I consider Mango more than a person. Actually, they were just finishing breakfast in this very quiet spot alongside a peaceful stream where Mango had a wonderful time, and so would my mother Zena, when we arrived. The food preparer of the owner of the spot also knew to make herself as inconspicuous as possible.
 
You would know that there are not as many Spanish Central Bank regulators as there are Spanish people who own one or more banking accounts. In fact most Spanish people should they be afforded the opportunity to meet with a Spanish Central Bank regulator, they might very well go prostrate; that is to tell you how most literate people in the world react to a Central Bank regulator.
 
Rafa was most eager, at first, to explain to me how the European banking system worked, but when I asked, “How does the European Commission decide on which country gets the Euros if there is a monopolist who has their own exclusive and untraceable diamond currency able to interfere with the process?”, Rafa went white. 
 
If a Central Bank regulator cannot explain how the money system works then it would be wrong to think that everyone else knows how it works.
 
Would you know how to explain how the EU decide which members of the EU such as France, Germany, Holland and Spain each get their Euro monies given how systemically rotten and totally absurd is the foundation of all economic policies; namely the gross Gross Domestic Product Index?
 
Rafa and I started an email dialogue but it wasn’t long before he went quiet.
 
You would have to agree that Geoffrey Rothwell Phd is now exclusively focused on distracting when writing to let me know that because he will soon be 65 his disgraceful contract with the OECD whose only purpose in being established in the upside down year of 1961 was to promote the insane GDP economic index as well as wipe out all opposition to nuclear weapons development ends August 1st.
 
Moving on.
 
Gary
 
PS – Mango had a little surgery yesterday to remove a couple of warts. He is doing fine.
 
but prefers his freedom.
 
[Word count 6322]
On Jun 22, 2018, at 7:09 AM, De Repetitor <repetitor@ziggo.nl> wrote:
Sorry for not yet replying to the to the other mails yet.
I can tell you some basic things about EU antitrust law, part of my EU law course
National anti trust law is basicly not very different from EU anti Trust law, as the EU anti trust law sets the standards.
But if say the EU has a minimal threshold of say 5 million euro’s, then the national anti trust law authorities can prosecute below that
if the company is for 2/3rds operating in one EU country.
(the 5 milj threshold nr I am making up,. I would have to look up the figures.)
But I can tell you something about, Kartels, Economic power position (eg you have more than 50 percent of the market shares) and take overs.
Of course I am not a specialist.

—–Oorspronkelijk bericht—– From: GaryStevenGevisser
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 6:29 AM
To: international@purdueglobal.edu
Subject: Im interested in anti-Trust law

Who should I speak to?

Thank you,

Gary S. Gevisser

Loading